Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Best to answer your question with a question: What if Tuurngait was lying? It sure seemed extremely aggressive.
As for me personally, I find Tuurngait far more interesting than humans either way. I'd try to convince him to destroy humanity together.
well lets see if im right.
The miners that mined the place before the Archaic arrived were all killed due to Tuurngait.
all they were doing was mining correct? they didn't seem like bad guys. Red was infected with Tuurngait virus and could not kill himself because his individual Tuurngait virus prevented him from doing so... i think. Sounds like Tuurngait was bad.
The hikers at the underground ice lake were killed because of the Tuurngait infection.
These two sets of people seemed innocent but were killed due to Tuurngait if im not mistaken.
BUT the important point made in the game is that as an individual man is good, but as a collective man is bad. The reverse is true for Tuurngait. The collective hive mind is good, but seperate, we get infections like Clarence.
Philip, the main character, decided to reveal to people that Tuurngait existed, and that they should "kill them all". I'm thinking Philip came to the conclusion that Tuurngait had to be destroyed because it breeds very horriable beings like Clarence.