Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Wait until you will meet Ivarr!
Psycopath deluxe, not even close to Dag.
The writing on Dag is a bit strange as he just suddenly turn very aggressive against Eivor, but I guess that is what happens when UBI need to create situation where characters seem to be somewhat logical.
Ivar was a character I at least somewhat understood even if I didn’t like him.
Ivar was obsessed with obtaining the glory of Valhalla he was willing to go to any means to obtain it however he misunderstood Odin didn’t simply want hardened warriors he wanted the the honorable at his table.
Ivar simply had no honor that made him worthy of Valhalla that’s why most people toss his axe.
Dag on the other hand he was both a hardened warrior and an honorable one.
His problem was he was a damn fool.
Placing no trust in his allies, letting conspiracy’s run free in his head, challenging eivor to a fight to the death rather than simply trusting Sigurd.
Dag had his flaws but none that deserved having Valhalla taken from him.