安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The difference between the two stores and the staggered release for me though mainly comes down to content, early players get buggy release (not that AC Valhalla improved with time in this area) and slow DLC releases over next year and half or so.
Or wait ...and get all content at a discounted sale price and hopefully a game that does not crash like this POS does.
Valve has higher standard when it comes to games, so they probably declined the garbage and the cash-grab that is Mirage :)
I need valhalla ng+
The next AC after mirage is terrible, too
AC is dead
example: Epic paid $147mUSD to prevent Borderlands 3 from releasing on steam for a year.
The whole model Tim Sweeny came up with was to make a storefront that catered to execs/publishers that don't want people to know how ♥♥♥♥♥ their game is before you spend $!20 on it and to put money where his mouth is he'll pay you the full development cost of your product. I don't think I've seen a less market friendly / consumer hostile scheme, but i can tell that there's almost nothing of value that comes out of Epic, so the billion dollar publishers sure are right about their ♥♥♥♥♥♥ products.
then go on UC if you feel an actual want to play the game. if you say "Becaause Steam" or some other BS then your just complaining to complain like a twitter user