Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Of course its possible, its been done in almost all the other games they released here
i've had many posts deleted without warning
warnings are manually submitted
They did, and more examples are in the comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/zk5m30/ubisoft_sent_me_a_warning_on_steam_for_requesting/
That's incorrect.
And you are allowed to be wrong.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/447040/discussions/0/3713811178918442556/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/552520/discussions/0/3718314709217924534/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/939960/discussions/0/3711559313412140604/
You are missing the point - the user in question received a warning for a thread created a week before the moderators made a decision to limit the discussion to only a single big thread.
This is a retroactive application of new rules, which, of course, makes no sense and deserves criticism.
It makes sense to condense the discussions, sure. But it makes no sense to issue warnings to people who created those older discussion threads, because nobody in the past could have known about a new rule being introduced.