Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
O-okay...
But anyway I completely agree with what you said about the backstory and all that. Whoever thought giving him a backstory doesn't understand the whole concept of how the player is supposed to be Gordon. Another thing that pisses me off is how HL2 grounded you in a "good-guy" state, whereas HL1 allowed you to go Rambo on everyone, allowing you to shape your own backstory and personality for Gordon. Killing a scientist didn't shift the plot or mess with Gordon's character because there wasn't one back in '98.
Correct me if im wrong (Have not played HL2 in months) but you were allowed to kill citizens and members of the resistance, right?
Though I do think he doesn't have a character outside of your influence.
Errr, thats because it wasent supposed to be a serious game! It was a fun and quirky FPS.
Half-Life 2 took the serious part of it and made the finest FPS ever made (Suck it COD)
btw, you're gonna anger all the fanboys who will fight to the death to bring you down becuase you said a bad thing about their perfect game.