Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
He doesn't know. Because he actually knows jack-all about "lore".
1. Sororitas don't take vows of celibacy. Some might, but it's not a requirement.
2. Sororitas have been CANONICALLY known to engage in sexual relationships, even without corruption or any "fall from grace", simply as a matter of course (see novels).
3. It makes perfect sense because historically even nuns who actually did take oaths of celibacy (unlike Sororitas), did not always adhere to those oaths.
4. To think that a Sororitas faith in the Emperor really hinges upon whether she ♥♥♥♥♥ or not is to completely misunderstand the Emperor, his worship, and the tenets of the Order.
5. In any event, for an Imperial to have sexual relationship with a mutant or a xeno is 1000 times less "lore friendly" than having it with a comrade in arms Sister of Battle. However, in this game you can have a relationship with a mutant AND a xeno. But not with a Sister of Battle.
Who is also, coincidentally, the only white female companion in the crew.
And this had to be done on the orders of Games Workshop. Even though they know very well who their core audience is.
Go figure.
Oh I know. I knew he didn't know what he was talking about. Most of these smug, "It's against the lore" bros who waltz into threads like these know ♥♥♥♥ all about the lore.
*BLAM* *BLAM* *BLAM*