Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The difference is, Hexagoros was on point, while you quoted random messages and implied he thought something of you.
Oh no, my favorite word: Satire. *gulp*
within the last decade companies have direct access to more consumer data and feedback than they ever had before. couple this with the recent shift of remote work, and Covid quarantines have both incentivized people to take up more indoor entertainment and hobbies. The sales of table top games has soared dramatically since 2020, while already being on the rise of popularity in general.
The increase in sales of products like WH40k has also increased the demographics of people interested in these products, which has also increased the amount of feedback and data they have on their customer base.
Alan Merrett (Writer, Game Designer, and ex-head of the GW intellectual property has already stated that "The reason there are no female space marines has nothing to do with lore, or background, or character of Marines. It to do with simple logistics of making miniatures and selling miniatures. Early Citadel ranges had female models of most character types - in fact when we produced the C range the intention was that upwards of 25% of all models would be female.
But when we first started selling the first fully formed C code, which was C01 Fighters, retailers kept complaining to us that customers weren't buying female models, and could we not include them in their restocks. So we took the female models out of circulation (I simply didn't include them in the production cycle).
It wasn't the only example! and so we pretty much stopped any thoughts of doing massive ranges of female wizards, etc... This was in the early to mid 80's. Citadel customers made it clear that they weren't interested in buying female models.
So when the Rogue Trader ranges and exciting new Space Marine model ranges it was difficult to see how we could logistically add the occasional female mode to the mix (Blisters of marines came in packs of 3 and the days of huge random mixes were long gone).
All the background fluff about why there are only male Space Marines is there to justify a commercial logistics issue."
So I think in the case of GW they have made the decision to make more female models because there is a demand that once wasn't there.
GW has also added males to what used to be female only groups, the assassins were exclusively female until the mid 1990's when they started adding male assassins to the roster.
The thing to remember is that Warhammer 40k is a table top game first, the lore is background and is created in service of the game. There are a lot of people that just enjoy the table top game for what it is, and couldn't care less about the lore anymore than someone cares about the lore of Candyland, or Monopoly.
It doesn't mean the complaints about lore retcons/inconsistencies aren't a factor, but they aren't the sole feedback the company is going to use to make business decisions about their game, especially since the novels account for only 1% of GW's revenue, the fact of the matter is that the majority of the Warhammer 40k community does not care about the lore, they just like to play the table top.
They are paying customers, and they also deserve to have their feedback taken into consideration, that's just good business practices. Lore is fluid and is constantly changing, some are good, some aren't. Doesn't mean there is a particular political agenda tied to it when the simple and logistical answers are readily available, and doesn't require conspiracies to be involved.
Look, at the end of the day, I think it's unfortunate for girl gamers there's no female character options in this game, be it a Sister of Battle, Custode, etc.
I don't think it's a big deal for a gal to take on the role of a male protagonist for the campaign, but when your invited to create your own character for the PvE/PvP missions, it kinda feels like a "step-down" from virtually every other online experience where you build a character. o_O
Any way, I'm still still hyped for this game either way. :3
Marine women are on the way, whether they like it or not.
GW would be crazy NOT to change the lore to have female.
Not that I would agree with it, but I also wouldn't mind it either.
More options is always better than few options.
I bet they will outsell the male marines, lol.
Dudes will be coming out of the woodworks for those elegantly designs death machines.
The Gothic architecture such as that is only present in books and art work. Now, if I were to ask for a faction full of Gothic iconography in their models, where would you point me to? The Primaris Black Templars? Or a small smattering of subfaction models? Or would you point me to the faction with church tanks. Or mini-cathederal-esque walkers. If I were to ask for a faction that's focused on "burning heretics". Where would the direction be?
This is why I say being women isn't the only defining trait of the Sisters of Battle. And it's why nobody complains when there's women in the Imperial Guard. Or as Inquisitors. Because it turns out being women isn't a defining factor. In one of your examples, Inquisitorial Stormtroopers, they also have women. As such, do they detract from the Sisters of Battle?
The aesthetic is directly what I'm going for, and signifying why it isn't their special thing. You can put anyone in boob plate and a corset, but you can't make anyone religious fanatics running around screaming with flamethrowers or meltas. At least not as easily.
One of the other big things is that it's not lore makes models (usually. There are occasional exceptions like that one Cadian gal from a book). The models make the lore. So with women in the space marines, y'know what you do? Just give them feminine heads. They've shown they can do that with Cadian sculpts. Don't make em all churchy. Don't make their sculpts all funky. Just keep em as Marines. And surprisingly, they still look completely different and seperate from SoB
Tbh considering that it's marines, I don't think they'd outsell. They'd be bundled in together most likely, in which GW can use that as an excuse to make the Primaris kit $5-10 more expensive because of new sculpts. Similar to what they did to the Cadian box before 10th
Actually, you're probably right. They'd more than likely just keep the same body types, and just make female looking heads. Done. :D
That's what I hope they do at least. Doesn't really make much sense to me to make an entirely new sculpt thing goin on outside the head. Plus, minimizes the effort put forth.
Am I doing it right?