Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
yes suspicion is enough, being suspect is a crime , ignorance be your shield hate be your weapon , Duty is life and questions are heresy.
in the first one Leandros reports titus for heresy to drax , titus is woried about the people of graia and knows the inquisition could execute the entire planet. so titus takes one for the team so to say.
In fact a question can be raised on why the Chaplain is not present in battles where Chaos sorcery is involved, a Chaplain's zeal and inspire would be duly needed to counter Chaos corruption.
But he hides back in the ship and casts doubt on Titus.
It's ridiculous. He should have been there to knock Imurah's head off.
I went into detail why they are not, you doubling down, doesn't change the fact that Blackshields are not Black Shields. The Deathwatch Black Shields are something entirely different from the Warbands of 30k that went by the name Blackshields.
Except, i didn't make anything up. I quoted the relevant part and gave you the source for the Fantasy Flight Roleplaying game that goes into more detail. You on the other hand have no sources, because Blackshields do not exist in 40k, to my knowledge.
At best they are about as canon as the Fantasy Flight addition, which cover the possible personal motivations of a Black Shield, not however the rest i mentioned.
You are just wrong, and you have nothing to base your speculation on.
They don't. Just like not every chapter respects the Inquisition, there are a lot of Chapters that do not like serving in the Deathwatch and will try to avoid it, if possible. Pretty much all Chapters that are in danger of their "secret" to be spilled to the Inquisition are very apprehensive to send people to the Deathwatch. Dark Angels, for example, do not send anyone initiated into the deeper secrets to the Deathwatch, leaving it solely a position for the Uninitiated and blissfully unaware of the Fallen.
You ask me how me pointing out that 200 years are a long time, even for beings with absurdly long lifespans, does apply to you suggesting that 200 years aren't a long time because they can life for a couple centuries?
I am not even sure how to begin to explain to you that 200 years are 200 years, regardless of how long you life.
200 years are 200 years. Time is fixed, and while you can, in theory, stumble into a warp current and be whisked 300 years into the future, the same thing can happen in reverse.
We do not know what happened to Leandros. For all we know in Titus 200 years he lived 10000, after he was cast into an unfortunate warp current. It is equally likely that he only lived 2 months. We have nothing to go on, so all we can do is assume, based on the fact that he has a respectable position, he managed to serve his penance and gain enough accolades to gain the position (Unless you wish to engage in a bad faith argument and simply assume that the Devs put Leandros in the position just because they couldn't fit him anywhere else, where he could remain a thorn in Titus side).
Even humans, today, can redeem their past deeds within the span of a regular lifetime... there is no reason to assume Leandros couldn't have done so in the two centuries that have passed.
I never claimed more than that. We lack information, but 2 centuries are enough to serve a penance and still manage to gain recognition. We know this much, because people can do it in Real Life.
A Historical example would be Emperor Ashoka of Magadha. In his early days he was a horrific person, famous for even building himself a personal torture chamber, affectionately named Ashoka's Hell. He had a midlife crisis, realized how ♥♥♥♥♥♥ a person he was, converted to Buddism and spend another 3 decades as a benevolement, stable and peaceful ruler, repenting for his actions in the past.
Or if you want a more recent example.. Alfred Nobel, the guy that invented the Nobel Price, started out a merchant of war, was a raging antisemite and chauvinist, and all around terrible human being... and still most people consider his legacy favorable.
Nobel is a great example of a person that can be a raging D-bag and still become widely accepted and respected by society, to the point that they even made up a sob story about how he had his Mr Scrooge Moment, to mend his ways. (A story that has no evidence to it)
So, if we consider that humans can gain recognition despite being a terrible person or redeem their ways within a human life time, why would that not be possible in a time span of 2 centuries?
And you base that on what exactly? Most societies these days consider 25 years to be enough to repent for the act of cold blooded murder... even if we assume Leandros has to spend 100 years in the dog house, it would still leave enough time to make a come back. Especially if he showed the other Chaplains how repentant he was.
>200 years is a lot of time.
Admitting my fault and giving reasoning for why i wrote Blackwatch, in a discussion about Black Shields, is not hedging. Especially in the face of you coming on extra strong to a simple freudian slip. I have no problem admitting my faults.
I am also not "hedging" when i am offering a possibility in a discussion, because i never asserted that "this is how it happened". Drawing inferences based on the information we have and the actual background, is also not "hedging".
And because i never asserted a definite solution, it is also no "Argument for Silence". An Argument from silence is using the absence of information as proof of the possibility. However, i did not say "this is what has happened"... i said "we don't know what happened, but two centuries are enough time that this is a possibility".
As for the "God of the Gaps"... we ain't having a theological discussion here. Throwing some words around, hoping the other person ends up being impressed doesn't work here. Way to try to invoke Brandolini's law, in hopes I will just not put up the effort to respond to your BS and thus make it seem like you made a point.
Yes... and Leandros is the posterboy Chaplain. As for the Flying Spaghetti Monster... who knows:
Space Marine Chaplains have their own religion to uphold, based on the Chapter's Culture they are serving with. And unless its a Black Templar that spirituality they uphold is not the Imperial Creed.
Leandros is a posterboy Chaplain Personality because he has a real hard-on for heretics and heresy. And as such you can easily argue that his breech of the chapter custom might have been misguided but not wrong. With the right "stewardship" he thus could be taught to direct his zeal in a chapter compliant direction. Which then would serve easily as basis to put him on track to become a Chaplain.
A perfectly fine line for a Space Marine Chaplain. That is literally what they exist for. They are the last bastion against Heresy within the Chapter and it being said by Leandros might have been an extra point of contention, but it could have been said by any other of the Chapter Chaplains and it would have been perfectly concurrent with their position and role in the Chapter.
The fact that he had allegations made against him, means that he will always be watched by both the Chaplains and Inquisition.
As another poster in this thread remarked: "Finding no evidence for heresy only means you haven't looked hard enough".
By Agni, are you obnoxious.