Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No, ppl judged it purely by its wokism. That's why and how that number of players.
Yes this is a solid logic.
Concord was maaaybe a 6? The gameplay and graphics were serviceable but all the rest was just way off the mark and nobody wanted a new hero shooter at this point in time.
Only issues I had were performance, but even then it was mostly heat and average 60-90 fps on ultra gfx, And I don;t rate a game on fixable performance issues.
I very rarely complete SP games... I completed this campaign on vet in 20 hours, was fun the entire way through, Now I'm having tons of fun in operations and have painted my own Black Templar and leveling Heavy. There is just soo little to complain about, and it has a very bright future and space marine 3.