Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Either way, the quick answer is "yes," I still think the game's worth picking up even if you just want to experience the campaign single player. :)
Personally, I'd say it's not worth $60 for 1/3rd of the content with a playtime of 10-12 hours. But value is subjective, so it might be worth it for you. The campaign length is at least average for the shooter genre.
Here's hoping it'll turn out that way... but I've been burned before, for example with Battlefront 2 back in the day... they promised a full singleplayer campaign, but what it turned out to actually be was nothing but a string of tutorial missions for the multiplayer mode.
Not saying I expect the same degree of BS here, just saying I'm worried that for someone like me (to whom 60 bucks also is an actual fortune), I'm just worried that I would be done with the game in about 10 hours and that's it for good.
Guess we'll have to wait and see.
Edit:
Co-Op with Bots could be a nice value add, IF the AI is at least somewhat tolerable...