We all paid for a demo.

[𝚂𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫]

The story of the game lasts 6-7 hours. Online content is almost non-existent. 3-5 maps and the same creatures.

I think the developers are mocking us, there is not even UW support in the full price game. We gave money to a demo that was officially a full release.

people who are thinking of buying this game definitely do not deserve the price, I want to state that it does not deserve more than 15 dollars. Wait for discounts, most players are experiencing performance issues and online connection problems are annoying.

It should have been released as early access, not as a full version.

In addition, PVP is absolutely terrible, the characters are extremely slow and there is absolutely complete inequality between classes.

In PVE, it is extremely difficult to respond to swarm attacks due to the slow attacks of the character, if you do not have proper teammates, it leads to a waste of 40 minutes of time. You need to do a crazy grind for cosmetics. The fastest way is to win in PVP if you don't get stuck in the “loading screen”.

I want to say this to the people who are commenting on this game as if it's great and amazing: It reached its upper limit on the first day it came out, reaching 225,690 players, and only 6 days later... There are now 124,144 players. There is no need to say anything anymore. If this game was great, the numbers should have continued to grow from day one, not to lose 100,000 people before even a week is over.

And that's assuming today is the weekend.

I'm right.

[Nurgle's Left Ballsack]

we paid for a demo? ... are you and i playing the same game? ive played far more unfinished games and this game is very far from unfinished. is it short? yes, yes it is. if you played it in baby mode difficulty. i played it in nightmare on my first run, so it took a very long time for me to finsh. did i enjoy it? yes, yes i did. do i consider this game complete? hell no, i want my damn cape. would i be willing to play dlc's/expansions that add more campaigns to this? hell yes.

[Sparhawk122]

The story mode for this game is nearly as short as the MW3 campaign.

[ThotsBContagious]

I'm the walrus님이 먼저 게시:

no

Never thought of it like that, you right.

[𝚂𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫]

kanna님이 먼저 게시:

we paid for a demo? ... are you and i playing the same game? ive played far more unfinished games and this game is very far from unfinished. is it short? yes, yes it is. if you played it in baby mode difficulty. i played it in nightmare on my first run, so it took a very long time for me to finsh. did i enjoy it? yes, yes i did. do i consider this game complete? hell no, i want my damn cape. would i be willing to play dlc's/expansions that add more campaigns to this? hell yes.

if you like and enjoy playing the same maps and missions over and over and spending 40 minutes of your life on each one, that's your life, but unfortunately I don't hate life enough to do the same things.

[UNKNOWN]

kthewookie님이 먼저 게시:

Agree with OP. It feels like a £15 game to me.

facts game is wayyy overprized, severly lacks content, AI companions are terrible, i dont care about PVP looks boring as hell anyway

[normalplaye]

the entire budget spent on these cinematic cutscene anyway. Can't blame them for that. At least I did have fun playing the game so no regret.

[Borba]

GTFO, it's been AGES since we got a game that plays this good, no filler, just a fun and badass experience, get back to your GAAS

[Navhkrin]

Exinferis님이 먼저 게시:

Yes, you can set any resolution, but that is not all. It is a difficult decision what to cut or what and where to extend on certain aspect ratios and in competetive games like in PvP you have to keep in mind what might give some an advantage over others. And to see more is definetly an advantage that can kill PvP.
Think of this... Someone with a 16:10 or 16:9 sees a certain aspect of the area in front. Some enemies auf of the FoV. Then there is someone with 21:9 or 32:9 who has a wider angle of view and so he can see more enemies and react accordingly.
Or if you give people always the same viewangle left to right, that might result on those with 16:x to see more from top to bottom.
And more view area results in more calculations and work for CPU and GPU and it is more hard to keep the performance. There is much to take into consideration. Not speaking of skalings and such.
So you might have written renderers for your personal projects, but you left out a lot to think about for this type of game.

Lmao PvP balance as if this game has ranked competitive PvP. It just has PvP attached for fun. Everyone who bought utlrawide is well aware of performance implications.

[UNKNOWN]

Borba님이 먼저 게시:

GTFO, it's been AGES since we got a game that plays this good, no filler, just a fun and badass experience, get back to your GAAS

Red Dead Redemption 2, Elden Ring, Baldurs Gate 3, Cyberpunk 2077 and the list goes on. so no it has not been ages since awesome games have been released. this game is a 4 or a 5 out of 10 at best

[grazr]

A 4-6 hour campaign is pretty standard for triple A titles with multiplayer functionality. If you're only here for the story then you can't really complain about receiving "half a game" when you're just ignoring the other half.

I just hope they do proper balance passes on the multiplayer, in SM1 they did one or two hotfix balance passes and then left it. Half the weapons and weapon upgrades were useless in Exterminatus PvE mode.

[Navhkrin]

UNKNOWN님이 먼저 게시:

Borba님이 먼저 게시:

GTFO, it's been AGES since we got a game that plays this good, no filler, just a fun and badass experience, get back to your GAAS

Red Dead Redemption 2, Elden Ring, Baldurs Gate 3, Cyberpunk 2077 and the list goes on. so no it has not been ages since awesome games have been released. this game is a 4 or a 5 out of 10 at best

Completely agree. This game falls utterly short near the masterpieces we had like Baldurs Gate 3.

[ThotsBContagious]

UNKNOWN님이 먼저 게시:

Borba님이 먼저 게시:

GTFO, it's been AGES since we got a game that plays this good, no filler, just a fun and badass experience, get back to your GAAS

Red Dead Redemption 2, Elden Ring, Baldurs Gate 3, Cyberpunk 2077 and the list goes on. so no it has not been ages since awesome games have been released. this game is a 4 or a 5 out of 10 at best

Lol, 2077 took 3 yrs to fix and its still pretty broken.

[Navhkrin]

grazr님이 먼저 게시:

A 4-6 hour campaign is pretty standard for triple A titles with multiplayer functionality. If you're only here for the story then you can't really complain about receiving "half a game" when you're just ignoring the other half.

I just hope they do proper balance passes on the multiplayer, in SM1 they did one or two hotfix balance passes and then left it. Half the weapons and weapon upgrades were useless in Exterminatus PvE mode.

That is completely incorrect. Any game that has shorter than 15 hour campaign shouldn't call itself tripla A unless it has extremely well built multiplayer (which is not the case here)

[Navhkrin]

ThotsBContagious님이 먼저 게시:

UNKNOWN님이 먼저 게시:

Red Dead Redemption 2, Elden Ring, Baldurs Gate 3, Cyberpunk 2077 and the list goes on. so no it has not been ages since awesome games have been released. this game is a 4 or a 5 out of 10 at best

Lol, 2077 took 3 yrs to fix and its still pretty broken.

3 years to fix a game with massive open world, hundreds of quests and one that offers over 70 hour campaign with state of the art delivery is completely understandable. CP77 is around 100x more complex than this game whose only saving grace is that it is W40K game

[ThotsBContagious]

Navhkrin님이 먼저 게시:

ThotsBContagious님이 먼저 게시:

Lol, 2077 took 3 yrs to fix and its still pretty broken.

3 years to fix a game with massive open world, hundreds of quests and one that offers over 70 hour campaign with state of the art delivery is completely understandable. CP77 is around 100x more complex than this game whose only saving grace is that it is W40K game

Lol the missions weren't that diverse outside of PL/Side missions. The world is barely alive and still isn't. Stop simping for garbage games and then praising them 3-5 yrs later as if all is forgiven. Story is nice but it was pulled from stores you're picking and chosing.

Edit - Its been in dev since 2013 plus comparing a open world to a fps linear shooter is redundant anyway