Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Up to you if any of those are subjectively bad enough for you to care about or not.
TIME TO LEAVE A NEGATIVE REVIEW.
The only legitimate gripe is performance/technical problems, the rest are whinging about things that are being added in the next update or about EAC despite a non insignificant portion of these people playing games with eac lol
it's not good either.
but it's been on an upward trend so will probably endup somewhere between 80 and 85% which is pretty good.
This game getting an 80% is honestly way better than I expected, it's a niche IP follow up to a very underappreciated first entry.
it's much much much better to think of steam reviews as "i enjoyed the game" or "i didn't enjoy the game" than anything remotely close to objective.