Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If I ran this game at 1080p on my 37 inch screen it would look horrible, let alone my TV. In my case there's a very appreciable difference even between 1440p and 4k. It also stands to reason that if somebody has a screen capable of a higher resolution, they will have a GPU that can support running games at that resolution at least decently well.
And since this game is not very difficult to run (provided you turn off reflections), I see no reason why anybody with an ability to run the game at a high resolution would purposeful limit themselves to a lower one. It just doesn't make any sense.
Your response really should be:
"I've convinced myself that I see a difference, so I want to keep fighting the settings".
If there is a difference, it's so minuscule as to not matter. Either that or you're sitting way too close to a 48-inch "monitor".
I don't use the full monitor. I use as as a 21:9 aspect ratio so I use considerably less screen space than you think.
I absolutely see a difference, especially in 100% vs 200% render scale.