Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It might be too late to change your mind but much of Zeno Clash 2's magic relies upon the player being familiar enough with Zeno Clash 1. If you have any interest at all in understanding the protagonist, his motives, and how the setting is changed through his choices then DO NOT play Zeno Clash 2 without having first played Zeno Clash 1. The gameplay is fun in either if you just want a straightforward first-person-brawler but few titles warrant the attention to the surrounding narrative and other artistic merits on the level that both Zeno Clash 1 and 2 manage.
This is one of the few cases where I wouldn't recommend a player just skip to the sequel (As I do when telling gamers without a strong taste for RPG's to skip Witcher 1 and start with 2) or begin a franchise in a stronger, possibly more up to date later entry.
Tropes and cliches occur often enough (find the world-saving relic, rebel against the empire, expose a religion's corrupt and powerful clergy, fight wearing a flashy hair-cut) that players can easily understand and piece together any given game-franchise world without having experienced any events in the preceding installements. Doesn't work that way for Zeno Clash.