Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally, I recommend that if you have a lot of time to kill and own them, play the Trilogy parts individually at least once first, then get the free copy of Final Cut and play that afterward to compare the differences. If, on the other hand, you don't have quite so much time, then pick up and play Final Cut in incremental sections for a more streamlined convenient experience.
So if I play Final cut, I can use a single character to finish the entire game?
But If I choose to play VH1, VH2, and VH3 separately, my character from VH1 cannot be used in VH2 and I have to start a new character?
I think playing the trilogy parts, one at a time might be better. Would probably give the same experience as playing Diablo 1, 2 then 3.
For Trilogy: VH1 characters can be imported into VH2, but VH3 uses different classes so you'd be starting over with a new class (6 different specialists to choose from) at level for the last part.
I'm gonna go with your suggestion and play them separately first.