Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
if playing as black destroy gets you matched often against players that use red aggro then how are the red aggro players getting matched against black destroy?
it's random
I know, I know.. you think it don't exist because they didn't tell you about it.
Like a little kid that thinks they are hiding when they are actually covering their eyes. You just don't get it.
PLay best of three, build a good sideboard so you can answer any deck. You wont care who you are matched against. This is how magic was designed to be played. This isnt hearthstone. i get wizards wanted that Blizzard money but now we have a bunch of adhd kiddies thinking bo1 is real magic. FYI Wizards does not balance the game for that format at all. The match making and aggressive hand smoothing are only a thing in Bo1.