Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I understand that, what I'm saying is I typically run targeted removal and there's an answer for that right away, I change out a few cards and now it's I can't counter anything. I am not arguing the cards themselves i'm arguing the timing by replacing a play set or 2 (up to 8 cards) of removal for the counter spells.
The argument i'm trying to make here is that whatever I do or build I run into nothing but answers, this I expect will last another 2 weeks before I can actually get at least 5 daily wins compare to my 3 now or even compared to the 15 from 2 weeks ago. I'm arguing that there seems to be a cycle of win loss regardless of what you're doing. I was playing only 20 games for the 15 daily wins, now its 20 games with 3 wins if I'm lucky.
Don't know why this is relevant but to answer your question no. I've got 2 kids and 11 cats so just making sure everything is spelled semi correct is my main thing here.
Welcome to mtg arena brotha, where nothing is truly "random". lol
Proof or it didn't happen.
It's not rigged. You are only mad that you lost.
What kind of proof would you like? The matchmaking pitting me against higher ranked player by at least a rank or two? The feeling as though its leaning harder one way favoring a player more often then not? The money grabbing aspect? Honestly I was more so looking for others opinions. Sounds like you're as salty as me into the comments as you are lol
Matchmaking puts you with a random opponent (in ranked, within a tolerance of x ranks and determined by your distance). Games are often won or lost on opening hands. That is a thing that happens in the game. Make sure to mulligan properly. Player error.
If you haven't been winning for "weeks," its because your deck is likely too fragile for the format. Playing Jank and blaming the matchmaking system is a hard cope. Player error.
I occasionally see those trash 250 card decks. Those decks are REALLY BAD. You lost to a literal stack of garbage because you wanted to play an unconventional win condition. That is the risk you take when you play subpar cards and strategies. Player error.
You played mill in a format that Gaea's Blessing is legal? LOL Player error.
There are a lot of cards that play around counter spells, like Cavern of Souls for instance. You only noticed them when you tried to do it. Player error.
Just don't buy anything? Not a hard concept. Consumer error.
No one is salty but you for being asked for proof of your false claim.
At this point is sounds like you already have the answers lol glad everything in your eyes is player error which is insane. . You're here seemingly for attention which is fine. I'm going to move past ya and either let this die or reply to someone else. So good luck to ya cause I'm not going to go in circles
This is how it is or it's just cognition biais...
This isn't even close to how matchmaking works.
Ok this would actually make a bit more sense. I just don't like the fact that in a ranked setting, your rank doesn't seem to matter. I've got a few decks varying in both play styles and power levels. However, there should be no reason that when I get to platinum rank that i'm matched against bronze repetitively. Whether they win or lose how does this seem fun or even fair for anyone? Until last night haven't seen a single bronze then I hit platinum then I'm seeing them every other match then an actual platinum player like every 4 game. While Bronze all i seemed to play was gold and platinum. I just don't like the switch up. I believe the ranks should determine a large part in the rank you should play against.
As for the answer draws or decks this would make a bit more sense with the win loss streak concept in mind. It seems as though that's the case. It's just lame that in order to get anywhere in the ranked system now I've gotta beat up on bronze players who don't have an actual deck crafted for themselves or so it seems. In the end for those player whats the incentive to keep playing ranked? Wouldn't you think you'd lose more people the not in the long run?
lol, that is certainly a lot of information only you seem to have.
Me win- I gud
Me lose- Arena rigged!