Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
¹at least an attempt at being fair... whether it's effective or not is arguable.
It wasn't leaked, they were caught and this article is damage control.
At this point I'm convinced they just want to pick on noobs. I don't see the point in playing with weaker players. You can't improve your deck and gameplay if you aren't constantly challenged.
Sorry, I meant the people opposed the cards having weights.
There is such thing as a dumb question. People just say there is not to be nice.
One of us must have trouble reading, because i can't see anywhere where he said that.
Do me a favor and look up the definitions to words instead of expecting me to explain them for you.
Okay, now how's that amount to an acknowledgement that there are weight systems outside of Brawl?