I repeat: the shuffler is broken

[erutan2099]

I've said it before, I will say it again. The shuffler in this game is not good.

Case and point - I am literally winning bets consistently with my friends about what card I will draw next. If it were shuffled properly, I would not be able to do that.

[its a prank]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Bizeboy:

Yes this is known
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR0fhvy9LOQ&ab_channel=DesolatorMagic

Cant belive they didnt fix their game in so many years

[The_Dybbuk_King]

Oprindeligt skrevet af erutan2099:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Skipspik:

Please give us a statisticall analysis of the shuffler with the protocol you used to make such claim.

Protocol? Statistical Analysis? Dude, it's a card game and that is way too much effort.

It was at this exact moment that OP lost all (what little was there) credibility.

[TheStoryteller01]

As the old saying goes:

"If your hand is useless, your deck is useless"

[ChaffyExpert]

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Bizeboy:

Yes this is known
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR0fhvy9LOQ&ab_channel=DesolatorMagic

Cant belive they didnt fix their game in so many years

There is nothing to fix, a computer program that can't be fully random not being fully random isn't an issue.

[Ha 何豪源]

if someone can give me an answer that this game is not rigged, and then watch my account, then you are a hypocrite - when i use ragavan, i have the worst luck, and when i play against ragavan, they always topdeck. i should play lottery, i would been billionaire

[ChaffyExpert]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Ha 何豪源:

if someone can give me an answer that this game is not rigged, and then watch my account, then you are a hypocrite - when i use ragavan, i have the worst luck, and when i play against ragavan, they always topdeck. i should play lottery, i would been billionaire

It isn't rigged, so that accomplishes the not being rigged. Also you don't know what hypocrite means.

[ʍolɟ ǝɥʇ ǝsɹǝʌǝɹ]

I'm sure their goal is some kind of 50% winrate.

[its a prank]

Oprindeligt skrevet af ʍolɟ ǝɥʇ ǝsɹǝʌǝɹ:

I'm sure their goal is some kind of 50% winrate.

Its way cheaper to make a rigged shuffler than make a balanced game

[ChaffyExpert]

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

Oprindeligt skrevet af ʍolɟ ǝɥʇ ǝsɹǝʌǝɹ:

I'm sure their goal is some kind of 50% winrate.

Its way cheaper to make a rigged shuffler than make a balanced game

It's not rigged though, and you act like WOTC cares if the game is balanced. If that was the case there would be no obliterator. They know it's not balanced, they just don't care.

[ʍolɟ ǝɥʇ ǝsɹǝʌǝɹ]

Felt like my hand CMC were high so started tracking. Next 8 hands all above average. I think high CMC hands is one of the ways matches are rigged. 2 of those were mulligans so don't say 'just mulligan if you don't like your hand'. Its like they rig against mid range.

THEN IT CHANGED TO LAND SCREW. 3/4 screwed, aka missing land drops/ which delays turns you can play. 1 flood 4 lands in hand and then 2 on draw. so 4 land manipulated hands in a row...

Harder to spot because the MODE of rigging changes after maybe 10 games. Almost always present though.

[its a prank]

Oprindeligt skrevet af ChaffyExpert:

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

Its way cheaper to make a rigged shuffler than make a balanced game

It's not rigged though, and you act like WOTC cares if the game is balanced. If that was the case there would be no obliterator. They know it's not balanced, they just don't care.

If it wasnt of the shuffler some decks would be like 95% winrate

[ChaffyExpert]

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

Oprindeligt skrevet af ChaffyExpert:

It's not rigged though, and you act like WOTC cares if the game is balanced. If that was the case there would be no obliterator. They know it's not balanced, they just don't care.

If it wasnt of the shuffler some decks would be like 95% winrate

How do you know

[its a prank]

Oprindeligt skrevet af ChaffyExpert:

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

If it wasnt of the shuffler some decks would be like 95% winrate

How do you know

Because its a game with very poor balance and suffler helps with that, even then there are decks with very high winrate

[ChaffyExpert]

Oprindeligt skrevet af its a prank:

Oprindeligt skrevet af ChaffyExpert:

How do you know

Because its a game with very poor balance and suffler helps with that, even then there are decks with very high winrate

How do you know that though. Your claims isn't evidence for other claims.

Decks with a high winrate mean nothing it doesn't mean it's rigged or even unbalanced. It is unbalanced, but decks with high winrates isn't the reason why, nor does the shuffler have anything to do with it.

In short, shuffler's not rigged, there is no evidence that decks that should have a high winrate don't because of the shuffler specifically.

[Merry Christmas X-Box Its Usher]

i love how people use a video of this ape baby whining at the beginning about people laughing at his concave skull as proof to the game being rigged. you do realize i can make a video claiming to be god and put it on youtube does not make it true right? ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ dumbasses. stop playing 280 card badstuff if you dont want to lose all the time. or maybe put the effort into proving arena is rigged via tea reading into figuring out how to actually play.