Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
This is even more important for beginners who are beginning to take the game more seriously, sadly the group of people most likely to choose to skip this and just look up a meta deck online.
I'm not gatekeeping anything mate, it's advice.
I'm saying that if someone that is still pretty new is looking to learn the most in the least amount of time, building something themself will give them an accelerated understanding of how the game works, why certain cards are viable, and how to use them and plan around them most efficiently. Even if you wind up essentially making the same metadeck you'd have found online in the long run (and you will), you'll have gained valuable insight.
If you're not highly bored and irritated by having to sit through an Invasion of Alara into Bramble Familiar etc etc ad infinitum ad nauseam combo for the 35th time in a season, you're a more patient and tolerant person than me for sure.
Don't get me wrong, it's very cool the first 10 or 12 times you see it.
I never said that it was and if I implied that somehow it was by mistake. It's just a simple opinion: If you walk yourself through the steps that other (smarter and more experienced than you) people did to get to where they are, you frequently understand the choices they made.
It's like learning patterns in chess instead of just a string of letters and numbers to rote memorize an opening, or learning a derivation to a formula for something that allows you to understand why it works the way it does instead of trying to just memorize a massive equation.
Never meant to say it's the only way to do it. It's just an efficient way for people past the stage of "what is an end step again?" to jump to the next level.