Another bad PC port from KOEI TECMO?

[Potato]

Place your bet.

[Azukaos]

I preordered on PS5 just to be sure, last time on PC with MotBw it was janky as hell with the game running at full speed for no reasons.

[kiteless 凧無し]

Originally posted by Zem:

Originally posted by kiteless 凧無し:

you clearly didn't play it at launch

I did, and it really wasent that bad.

Maybe for you

Game kept crashing on a cutscene for me so I refunded, devs acknowledged the crash in patch notes so they obviously knew about it

Thanks for the clown rewards whoever is giving them to me, i love the free points, more please

[Nyaruko]

Originally posted by Just Life:

I'm going to be a bit optimistic and say they learned a thing or two from the PC port of Maiden of Black Water and Mask of the Lunar Eclipse will be a decent port.

you're going to inhale all the copium you mean. or you're paid reviewer

[DogMeat]

Sigh...

from pcinvasion:
"The game plays best with a controller and, unlike the last remaster, you can use your mouse out of the box without having to wait for a patch. Unfortunately, mouse movement is awful and appears to be emulating a joystick instead of using raw mouse input. It’s playable, but it doesn’t feel good at all. Which honestly describes the controls in every Fatal Frame game."

[Crix]

Isn't this the one that released Wild Hearts?

Wow, easy pass. Some places have no business releasing games if they can't provide the skills in their team to optimize their games. It's a shame they have some great titles but fail to release quality for the PC players. I remember Fatal Frame from the PS2. Great game but I already know it's going to be a problematic experience on PC.

[Bucherebis]

The performance is actually pretty good. But it unfortunately suffers from bad m/kb controls.

[Gitaroo]

its ported to the same engine as the last game so I expect it will run jut as well if not better with Wii assets.

[Raptor Senpai]

*DING DING* he was right

[Ryrykc]

Performance is good, matching with FF5, except for some weird control issues, it's a good port that doesn't have the launch problems like FF5 was.

So I called it, they did a much a better porting job this time after the experience.

[DogMeat]

Originally posted by FreakyAry:

Performance is good, matching with FF5, except for some weird control issues, it's a good port that doesn't have the launch problems like FF5 was.

So I called it, they did a much a better porting job this time after the experience.

"Weird" control issues? With what, mouse and keyboard or a controller? From what I've read the mouse controls are really bad.

[Ryrykc]

Originally posted by DogMeat:

Originally posted by FreakyAry:

Performance is good, matching with FF5, except for some weird control issues, it's a good port that doesn't have the launch problems like FF5 was.

So I called it, they did a much a better porting job this time after the experience.

"Weird" control issues? With what, mouse and keyboard or a controller? From what I've read the mouse controls are really bad.

Actually Ignore what I said, that was on my part, the only problem I have is the very slow camera turning speed, but when aiming it's normal.
I'm playing with K/M, and this time the default layout is very reasonable.

[Tracido]

Ok, I'm slightly impressed, it's about where the 5th game is technically, after finishing the prologue, with mouse and keyboard, I may not have to refund this, only irritating thing, is no 5.1 surround sound, but, I expected worse here..

[DogMeat]

Originally posted by Tracido:

Ok, I'm slightly impressed, it's about where the 5th game is technically, after finishing the prologue, with mouse and keyboard, I may not have to refund this, only irritating thing, is no 5.1 surround sound, but, I expected worse here..

So... its not that bad?