Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
CPU - Intel Core i5-10400
32 GB RAM
Those meet the recommended and the minimum.
Graphics card is my main concern as its recommended to be higher (obviously).
It's not a huge OW game with dozens of NPCs to handle like GTA ... why should it be CPU-intensive and how do you know it?
The CPU is more than enough and also RAM is!
It's CPU-intensive game but as long as your GPU fits minimal requirements you'll be able to play on low/medium settings. Just make sure your CPU fits minimal requirements [/quote]
My PC can run RDR2 fine with "normal" graphics. So I'm not sure if SH2 will be fine.
Not much into high detailed graphics. Just want the game to run smoothly.
It's UE5, which is worse than UE4. It's a miracle the minimal requirements are that low.
RDR2 is well optimized and it's not UE, which is known for being bad in terms of optimization. I can play RDR2 on high as well, but it doesn't mean I'll be able to play SH2Remake on high with the same framerate.
Bloober is not Rockstar Games and UE5 is not RAGE and not even RE Engine.
Good to know. Just trying to get an idea.