AMD GPU + FSR 1 vs FSR 3...

[Dude Guyman]

FSR 3 w/sharpening on looks like a blurry, butter smeared mess. Tip: AMD driver sharpening looks better than the in-game setting.
vs
FSR 1 w/sharpening off looks very detailed and sharp and runs about 8-10 FPS faster. Possibly more "crawling" side effect?

I like FSR 1. Also there is an amazing amount of audio detail you only hear with headphones.

Discuss..."come at me bro".

[Dude Guyman]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hjeNgxiDHA_oxUuplbVVym0H6NrEtBTW/view

They compressed and resized it, but you can still see the difference. You can download the full version if you care to see better.

[𝕻𝖗𝖎𝖒𝖊]

how about ghosting? the pictures look amazing

[Dude Guyman]

I don't notice any ghosting either way, but I have the settings fairly low to begin with. For me it's just that FSR 1 is MUCH more clear and sharp (look at the water in the tub!), even compared to FSR 3 with sharpening maxed. FSR 1 does not need sharpening, probably makes it look worse.

FSR 3 looks and runs worse (-8ish FPS vs FSR 1) than if I just run it at actual 1280x720 (on a 1920x1080 native monitor) and let the monitor "upscale". James' hair does get a bit pixelated in FSR 1, but it's just because it's not blurred all to heck.

[𝕻𝖗𝖎𝖒𝖊]

Originally posted by Dude Guyman:

I don't notice any ghosting either way, but I have the settings fairly low to begin with. For me it's just that FSR 1 is MUCH more clear and sharp (look at the water in the tub!), even compared to FSR 3 with sharpening maxed. FSR 1 does not need sharpening, probably makes it look worse.

FSR 3 looks and runs worse (-8ish FPS vs FSR 1) than if I just run it at actual 1280x720 (on a 1920x1080 native monitor) and let the monitor "upscale". James' hair does get a bit pixelated in FSR 1, but it's just because it's not blurred all to heck.

yes i agree, the tub look alot detailed, fsr 3 looks like it dripping butter XD