Do gamers realise their crying is pathetic

[masii07]

Woke this, woke that.
SBI this, SBI that.

- There isn't a single black character in trailers.

- You play as a white man. Thats not enough for you folks.

Every other new game thread it's pretty much whining.

This is not a good look. Do you folks realise pathetic this is?

Most of these complaints are superficial. Don't even affect gameplay.

Pick your battles well, this is not it.

[Tracido]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Stalker2010:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

And? Doesn't mean that constant disruption should be welcomed.

It's not your space alone then, no one is invading you nor knocking at your door.

This is true, the cheering brigades of censors who cheer burning books and art alike, are all here now, and they assume that means they can wipe the original niche crowds away the same as they get firms to censor the games for them.

Don't let them silence you if you don't support that stance, no matter what you personally believe in.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Stalker2010:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

And? Doesn't mean that constant disruption should be welcomed.

It's not your space alone then, no one is invading you nor knocking at your door.

90% of the threads on the front page barely have anything to do with the game lmao. Were are people that actually want to talk about the game supposed to go when the discussions have been entirely taken over by people trying to push political narratives?

[fkpokewedos]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Stalker2010:

It's not your space alone then, no one is invading you nor knocking at your door.

90% of the threads on the front page barely have anything to do with the game lmao. Were are people that actually want to talk about the game supposed to go when the discussions have been entirely taken over by people trying to push political narratives? :cozypoechris:

This threads are quite good measure of this "game" quality. Feedback from customers should be take into accout If you to have successful product.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fkpokewedos:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

90% of the threads on the front page barely have anything to do with the game lmao. Were are people that actually want to talk about the game supposed to go when the discussions have been entirely taken over by people trying to push political narratives?

This threads are quite good measure of this "game" quality. Feedback from customers should be take into accout If you to have successful product.

Yeah because "why female character look 'ugly'?" is stellar feedback.

[turn heel]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fkpokewedos:

This threads are quite good measure of this "game" quality. Feedback from customers should be take into accout If you to have successful product.

Yeah because "why female character look 'ugly'?" is stellar feedback.

It's been explained very thoroughly how these changes drastically undermine the intent of the story and characters. You just refuse to read, or simply cant.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

Likewise. Especially considering your side has been caught on record complaining that Laura (A child character) isn't attractive enough.

You're, not kidding, not smart enough to understand what anyone was talking about when complaining about how Laura looks... or SH2 in general. Your brain is wired in a way that it automatically twists peoples words to persecute you. "Your side", lol. Yeah everything is so cut and dry to you that it's no wonder you lack the cognitive ability to perceive subtlety.

There is nothing subtle about complaining that a child doesn't look attractive. lmfao. Those are words that should never come out of anyone's mouth.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

Yeah because "why female character look 'ugly'?" is stellar feedback.

It's been explained very thoroughly how these changes drastically undermine the intent of the story and characters. You just refuse to read, or simply cant.

Yeah I'm "sorry" that the Trauma victim isn't dressed like a wh*re. lmao.

[turn heel]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

You're, not kidding, not smart enough to understand what anyone was talking about when complaining about how Laura looks... or SH2 in general. Your brain is wired in a way that it automatically twists peoples words to persecute you. "Your side", lol. Yeah everything is so cut and dry to you that it's no wonder you lack the cognitive ability to perceive subtlety.

There is nothing subtle about complaining that a child doesn't look attractive. lmfao. Those are words that should never come out of anyone's mouth.

You're twisting peoples words due to your misunderstanding of the source material. Please have some respect for those who understand design choices. You're a liar unfortunately.

[Tracido]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

It's been explained very thoroughly how these changes drastically undermine the intent of the story and characters. You just refuse to read, or simply cant.

Yeah I'm "sorry" that the Trauma victim isn't dressed like a wh*re anymore. lmao.

So, you're openly admitting that nudity, and even clothing is a sexual act? That's some seriously concerning extremes.

On top of the fact you say a stripper with a regular dance schedule cannot dress as she enjoys?

Right wing as hell aren't ya?

[turn heel]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

It's been explained very thoroughly how these changes drastically undermine the intent of the story and characters. You just refuse to read, or simply cant.

Yeah I'm "sorry" that the Trauma victim isn't dressed like a wh*re. lmao.

You walk with zero humility, much like booger team. Thinking you know best due to pride. So much ignorance. What was James perceiving? What was the town mirroring back at the inhabitants? Trauma victims definitely usually dress prim and proper, sure.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

There is nothing subtle about complaining that a child doesn't look attractive. lmfao. Those are words that should never come out of anyone's mouth.

You're twisting peoples words due to your misunderstanding of the source material. Please have some respect for those who understand design choices. You're a liar unfortunately.

lmao. The mental gymnastics your going through are something else. "Actkually you see the child being attractive is essential to the source material erm your just misunderstanding the source material please have some respect sweatie"

[turn heel]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

You're twisting peoples words due to your misunderstanding of the source material. Please have some respect for those who understand design choices. You're a liar unfortunately.

lmao. The mental gymnastics your going through are something else. "Actkually you see the child being attractive is essential to the source material erm your just misunderstanding the source material please have some respect sweatie"

No one is calling her sexually attractive. You have issues if you think someone can't see a kid and think aww they're so cute. I adore my nieces and nephews. You are the one putting sex into peoples explanations.

Which is funny considering your pedobait anime avatar

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

lmao. The mental gymnastics your going through are something else. "Actkually you see the child being attractive is essential to the source material erm your just misunderstanding the source material please have some respect sweatie"

No one is calling her sexually attractive. You have issues if you think someone can't see a kid and think aww they're so cute. I adore my nieces and nephews. You are the one putting sex into peoples explainations.

The anti-woke movement has a track record of sexualizing child characters.

Notable examples include: -Crying WOKE over the removal of a panty shot from kingdom hearts 3.
-Crying WOKE that the ability to create child characters in games like dragons dogma 2, phantasy star online 2, and blue protocol was removed.

[orangecrush]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

Which is funny considering your pedobait anime avatar

The meds. Take them.

[Milkdust]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย orangecrush:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย turn heel:

No one is calling her sexually attractive. You have issues if you think someone can't see a kid and think aww they're so cute. I adore my nieces and nephews. You are the one putting sex into peoples explainations.

The anti-woke movement has a track record of sexualizing child characters.

Notable examples include: -Crying WOKE over the removal of a panty shot from kingdom hearts 3.
-Crying WOKE that the ability to create child characters in games like dragons dogma 2, phantasy star online 2, and blue protocol was removed.

Are we still talking about Silent Hill 2?