Akira Yamaoka, Takayoshi Sato and Masahiro Ito appreciation thread

[Harry Scrowtem]

because without Yamaoka, none of us would've been "Resting Comfortably" while playing Silent Hill throughout all the years, without Sato, none of us would have been enthralled in the world of Silent Hill and without Ito, None of us would have been pooping our pants while traversing it! Despite all the negativity SH2R has been getting, I'm very happy that two of them are involved with this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo65v1kTRZA

[mdesaleah]

Don't forget Sato (CG cutscene character designer) and the rest of the original team.

(oh wait, they're not involved in this new version)

[Dusty Bunny]

Originally posted by mdesaleah:

Don't forget Sato (CG cutscene character designer) and the rest of the original team.

(oh wait, they're not involved in this new version)

Sato - Takayoshi Sato, he is a very important person for SH2 remake. Without him, the development is not going to be good enough

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by mdesaleah:

Don't forget Sato (CG cutscene character designer) and the rest of the original team.

(oh wait, they're not involved in this new version)

Embarrasing... I was not aware he was involved, I only was aware of the other two
thanks for the info, i fixed it! while its not the full team, i'm still glad that at least some of the legendary team are involved in the remake.

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by Shiny Rose:

Originally posted by mdesaleah:

Don't forget Sato (CG cutscene character designer) and the rest of the original team.

(oh wait, they're not involved in this new version)

Sato - Takayoshi Sato, he is a very important person for SH2 remake. Without him, the development is not going to be good enough

this is true and I admit i am an idiot for not knowing Sato is also involved...

[turn heel]

Originally posted by Harry Scrowtem:

Originally posted by Shiny Rose:

Sato - Takayoshi Sato, he is a very important person for SH2 remake. Without him, the development is not going to be good enough

this is true and I admit i am an idiot for not knowing Sato is also involved...

He isn't involved.

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by turn heel:

Originally posted by Harry Scrowtem:

this is true and I admit i am an idiot for not knowing Sato is also involved...

He isn't involved.

I don't know what to believe anymore. *scratches head*
This is what i thought originally, I knew Yamaoka and Ito were definitely involved in it so that was who I mentioned first, and only after comment above said Sato was also involved, I mentioned him, now after re-reading it, i see that comment was meant sarcastically...
I still own up to being an idiot, but dr. dipschit md and shiny turd above me are also in this same ♥♥♥♥♥♥ boat with me

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by Harry Scrowtem:

Originally posted by turn heel:

He isn't involved.

I don't know what to believe anymore. *scratches head*
This is what i thought originally, I knew Yamaoka and Ito were definitely involved in it so that was who I mentioned first, and only after comment above said Sato was also involved, I mentioned him, now after re-reading it, i see that comment was meant sarcastically...
I still own up to being an idiot, but dr. dipschit md and shiny turd above me are also in this same ♥♥♥♥♥♥ boat with me

you really can't type r tard without it getting censored anymore?

[turn heel]

Lol mdesaleah clarified his sarcasm about Sato and the other members involvement in case the joke was lost, and still? Idk I was called that fairly recently p sure I just try not to curse anyway bc it's wrong and my grandma didn't.

[mdesaleah]

Originally posted by turn heel:

Originally posted by Harry Scrowtem:

this is true and I admit i am an idiot for not knowing Sato is also involved...

He isn't involved.

Yea, he's not. Just a misunderstanding.

[@R+5]

one of the many "funny things" about this game, are the game articles defending the devs as the "good guys" and trying to frame the japanese side as responsible of trying to make "unnecessary changes". something similar happened with starfield, and "positive review bombs" (which are the most common "real review bombs", if a "bomb" is means to hurt the franchise and or the audience by creating a false perception about the true quality of a product)

maybe in part thats true, since konami has been affected by dei, but is more likely bloober were responsible of those changes (their previous games were pretty mediocre, and they probably needed more dei funding than konami).

is hard to trust bloober, considering how they speak and try to justify the changes. most likely both konami and bloober were in agreement about "tweaking with dei the game" but selling it as "trying to be as faithful as possible" to try to avoid bad press and reactions.

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by turn heel:

Lol mdesaleah clarified his sarcasm about Sato and the other members involvement in case the joke was lost, and still? Idk I was called that fairly recently p sure I just try not to curse anyway bc it's wrong and my grandma didn't.

my grandma used to called me the r word all the time... lol jk

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by mdesaleah:

Originally posted by turn heel:

He isn't involved.

Yea, he's not. Just a misunderstanding.

i reread your post and seen the sarcasm now lol, that was a my bad.

[Harry Scrowtem]

Originally posted by @R+5:

one of the many "funny things" about this game, are the game articles defending the devs as the "good guys" and trying to frame the japanese side as responsible of trying to make "unnecessary changes". something similar happened with starfield, and "positive review bombs" (which are the most common "real review bombs", if a "bomb" is means to hurt the franchise and or the audience by creating a false perception about the true quality of a product)

maybe in part thats true, since konami has been affected by dei, but is more likely bloober were responsible of those changes (their previous games were pretty mediocre, and they probably needed more dei funding than konami).

is hard to trust bloober, considering how they speak and try to justify the changes. most likely both konami and bloober were in agreement about "tweaking with dei the game" but selling it as "trying to be as faithful as possible" to try to avoid bad press and reactions.

I agree with this statement 100%, those articles feel like they were running cover for bloober, not that I have anything against bloober or any of its games, I just trust the original team members to stay true to the vision they created, more so than a modern dev team who's only created games in the current sjw, dei, modern audience era.

[Hex: Cuse Me]

Originally posted by @R+5:

one of the many "funny things" about this game, are the game articles defending the devs as the "good guys" and trying to frame the japanese side as responsible of trying to make "unnecessary changes". something similar happened with starfield, and "positive review bombs" (which are the most common "real review bombs", if a "bomb" is means to hurt the franchise and or the audience by creating a false perception about the true quality of a product)

maybe in part thats true, since konami has been affected by dei, but is more likely bloober were responsible of those changes (their previous games were pretty mediocre, and they probably needed more dei funding than konami).

is hard to trust bloober, considering how they speak and try to justify the changes. most likely both konami and bloober were in agreement about "tweaking with dei the game" but selling it as "trying to be as faithful as possible" to try to avoid bad press and reactions.

Conspiracy theory crafter with funny tinfoil hat detected.