Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Capcom even started with an RE1 remaster and port in 2015 before diving into remakes
Silent Hill 2 Remake
Silent Hill f
Silent Hill Townfall
Silent Hill Ascension (Interactive Series )
Return to Silent Hill ( Upcoming Film )
They did mistakes in past atleast now they have reedemed themselves with all those announcements.
Mine as well. Sadly classics are not on steam.
As for SH we'll see, first this one needs to avoid a flop which I hope it manages to do even though I don't think I'll buy this at launch. The rest of the series are more niche titles so I feel that getting an SH1 remake would be comparable to Capcom remaking Code Veronica: something fans would like to see but doesn't matter much for a mainstream audience.
They haven't redeemed themselves until these products will work as intended.
Done properly, it could be one of the scariest games out there. The other games do what makes them great well enough even nowadays. SH4 is the only one I feel needs practical improvement.
SH1 they could wrap in an emulator and bundle with SH3.
Wouldn't really be a franchise resurrection, if not all of the mainline entries are available in some form at least.
- They already tried remastering SH2 and 3 once, it failed because they approached it in a bad way. It could be approached differently with a much better result but that's not how the industry works and especially not how Konami works, they won't step in the same puddle twice.
- SH1 is in a state a lot of PSX titles are too: simply providing an emulated copy wouldn't work because the game is far more problematic than that. SH1's PSX performance isn't exactly great and an emulated release would inherit all of that thanks to how PSX emulation works. So a proper release needs work but companies like Konami don't see the value in a PSX game because the dated graphics is a turn off for a mainstream audience. They won't even spend peanuts on a port.
- Considering the voice acting issues the SH2 and SH3 remasters faced chances are those issues still exist. That makes something like what they did with SH4 (let GOG release a fixed version of the original PC port) impossible without spending money on solving the problem and they won't spend money on decades old PC ports.
And considering how dumb these things can be it might even be the case that the SH2 remake exists because Konami hates Guy Cihi so much that they'd rather just remake the whole game on the cheaps with a Polish developer instead of giving that guy any more money.
Have you watched Christophe Gans latest interview?
Director of Silent Hill films said in interview that Konami saw Resident Evil 2 Remake's success and decided to do the same.
I mentioned 3 and 4 just because they were/will be a guaranteed success financially and that is what Konami want.
https://www.nme.com/en_au/news/gaming-news/konami-apparently-has-several-silent-hill-games-in-development-3325310
- RE2 was a landmark title on the PSX that sold a ton
- RE3 was a similarily successful sequel
- RE4 is widely regarded as one of the best games ever made and it also sold a ton of copies.
SH sales? Not even close to that and only SH2 managed to broke the "mainstream barrier". If Konami ever cared about completeness they would have started with remaking SH1 instead of 2.
Just tell me, What guarantee you that in under 4 years from now Konami won't announce a new remake after Silent Hill 2.