why is everyone running to grayzone ....

[Elemeno.]

this game looks amazing and runs alot better!!

i know the maps larger .. but so what ... i would rather a few smaller maps and have constant things to do rather than a large map with nothing inside it

[Sunbather]

Because Gray Zone Warfare actually gets South East Asia right. This game here is like it played in Eastern Europe but dressed as South East Asian. I'm gonna buy this game here as soon as a) we don't have factories in the middle of Vietnamese jungle (no such thing, as a Vietnamese recently just outlined here in the forums); b) we get actual guns from the actual region and not just the 08/15 from recent shooters (AS Val, UMP-45 etc. etc. (which are already confirmed to make things worse...); c) there are no more BTRs in the middle of Vietnam, lots of other vehicles to go with; d) AI ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ to me with an Asian accent (like they do in GWZ); e) the game focuses on being an actual singleplayer game and not just a grindy multiplayer game in offline mode; and f) we get more variety. One more map in 2024 just doesn't cut it.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Sunbather:

Because Gray Zone Warfare actually gets South East Asia right. This game here is like it played in Eastern Europe but dressed as South East Asian. I'm gonna buy this game here as soon as a) we don't have factories in the middle of Vietnamese jungle (no such thing, as a Vietnamese recently just outlined here in the forums); b) we get actual guns from the actual region and not just the 08/15 from recent shooters (AS Val, UMP-45 etc. etc. (which are already confirmed to make things worse...); c) there are no more BTRs in the middle of Vietnam, lots of other vehicles to go with; d) AI ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ to me with an Asian accent (like they do in GWZ); e) the game focuses on being an actual singleplayer game and not just a grindy multiplayer game in offline mode; and f) we get more variety. One more map in 2024 just doesn't cut it.

I don't agree with them getting South East Asia right. The first pic I saw of this game the mountains didn't look right. Mountains that steep never have trees covering them like that. Especially at the top. These look very unnatural.

[Snowdog705]

grey zone is awesome if you like the eft like game but so is this i think this one is a little more pre alpha then grey zone that is all

[Sunbather]

Originally posted by ♂TheBlasterMaster™✞:

I don't agree with them getting South East Asia right. The first pic I saw of this game the mountains didn't look right. Mountains that steep never have trees covering them like that. Especially at the top. These look very unnatural.

Well, it's a bit more than the mountains what draws you in. It's the architecture e.g. with ramshackle huts or spacious wooden traditional houses with lots of airflow. Then the droning ambience of frogs and birds. The literal green-ness of it all.

But ok, let's stick with the mountains for a second. And regarding that you are wrong. Like totally and utterly wrong.
https://www.insideasiatours.com/vietnam/northern-vietnam/ninh-binh

You can find about a million more pictures like that by typing "Vietnam + mountains" into a search engine of your choice.

[TheDinkster56]

I like Grayzone, I think its pretty good. But I still prefer Red River. I think with all the Tarkov drama Grayzone got a TON of publicity, its also more "flashy". I think over time Red River will kinda catch up.

[MissNurseXochi]

Originally posted by El_pipitas:

I don't get it neither. This game realeased with no pay2win editions, no bullsh*t. Just the game, works fine, looks gorgeous and plays pretty nice.

I know this is light on content but grayzone is just miles of empty jungle and runs like crap.

People is always complaining about scams, hype and greedy developers and they always fall for it EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Based reply.

I hate P2W and I hate ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ (online only, lack of optimization, etc.).

[GhostInTheAfro]

Screw Grayzone, everyday I launch Steam just to see if Incursion got any updates. I take the no bullsh*t approach over the hype any day.

[Chariothe]

I thought it's going to be niche game but look like the idea of always online consistent-open world shooter is much more interesting to many people.
Currently I'm not interest in it unless they add
1. Offline mode
2. Clearer distinctions between factions.
One thing I really like about it is how they made the map and buildings, it's much more realistic and immersive, this game feels like you are playing in a man-made Airsoft match.
I mean I don't mind the combination of two it's just about too much of something is not so good.
GZW could add a bit more clutters into the map, While Incursion could improve by adding more spaces between cluttered areas.

[Daedalus]

This game is trash and is multiple store bought assets patched into a game. Grayzone has had actual development over many years.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Sunbather:

Originally posted by ♂TheBlasterMaster™✞:

I don't agree with them getting South East Asia right. The first pic I saw of this game the mountains didn't look right. Mountains that steep never have trees covering them like that. Especially at the top. These look very unnatural.

Well, it's a bit more than the mountains what draws you in. It's the architecture e.g. with ramshackle huts or spacious wooden traditional houses with lots of airflow. Then the droning ambience of frogs and birds. The literal green-ness of it all.

But ok, let's stick with the mountains for a second. And regarding that you are wrong. Like totally and utterly wrong.
https://www.insideasiatours.com/vietnam/northern-vietnam/ninh-binh

You can find about a million more pictures like that by typing "Vietnam + mountains" into a search engine of your choice.

That looks more like it but where are the trees? The foliage is not the same.

[Max Mozin]

I was bored after one mission.. Did'nt touch any nerve at all. But I'll keep the game, and hopefully it will grow into something great. If not, not to much money out the window.

[Onirak]

Told yaaaaa lmaoooo. You can finally see the result of being PvE-only Nazis.... Since when having more choice was a problem? Now You big brains are going to learn this the hard way by ignoring that more choice = more players = more funds = better game/faster development. Indy developers being extremists by excluding other modes in advance, just to oppose to the "PvP Only" offered in Tarkov, is ridiculous. These naive paladin Devs, Instead of demonstrating that they can offer more variety, they decided to copy Tarkov, including one of its greatest flaws (being PvP only), proving to be almost as toxic as tarkov devs. I bet many of you who "valiantly" fought against a possible extra PvP mode are now playing GrayZone... y'all embarrassing af.

[DeathEye]

maybe because it actually has content? Red River needs like 2-3 years to be where Grayzone is now

and Grayzone will need at least 3 years to be where Tarkov is now gameplay wise..

[Snowdog705]

most people will play both one is not better then the other it is funny how people are looking to put grey zone down it is not pay to win at all i own both and will play both but red river is a demo at the moment when more content comes out it may became way better and grey zone is waay better then eft will ever be it has way better base to the game

[Pixelado™]

The main problems that gray zone has are not going to be solved for a long time... it is very undercooked. It is not worth continuing to dedicate hours to it for a few months.