Incursion Red River

Incursion Red River

Spook May 1, 2024 @ 6:20pm
3
2
2
2
this game is better than grey zone well done devs
this game is proof that you can release a game in pre alpha or early access and it is still in a playable and enjoyable state, red river has been a very enjoyable experience to play, yes the game is lacking content and more maps and more loot items ect... but thats why its in early access the game runs smooth and feels good the foundation is there for this to become a very very good game, more content will come and thats what we are looking forward to, keep up the good work devs you are showing us that you are a game company that knows how to do things right!

(meanwhile games like grey zone dev team are busy showing us how to do things wrong and players are leaving that game to come and try this game and they will be happy to play this game its a win win situation for red river)
Last edited by Spook; May 1, 2024 @ 6:22pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
RaidenFury May 1, 2024 @ 8:36pm 
Agreed. I'm enjoying this title.
Warrior1461 May 1, 2024 @ 9:41pm 
unlike Grey Zone this does not have a DLL file failure
Vandal May 2, 2024 @ 8:54am 
I like this game a lot. Can't wait for more content.
L1qu1dator May 2, 2024 @ 9:31am 
And it costs HALF the price!
ChubbiChibbai May 2, 2024 @ 9:37am 
Originally posted by L1qu1dator:
And it costs HALF the price!

And has a fraction of the content.
Additional content will take a long long time to come. Its a very small dev team going at a slow pace.

Look. I love both games. Both are great and both are good enough to stand on their own.

Why do gamers always have to put everything into an either or them vs us category. Two similar games that have a cross-over of player interest can exist at the same time. You don't have to try and create conflict out of that.
L1qu1dator May 2, 2024 @ 9:42am 
Originally posted by ChubbiChibbai:
Originally posted by L1qu1dator:
And it costs HALF the price!

And has a fraction of the content.
Additional content will take a long long time to come. Its a very small dev team going at a slow pace.

Look. I love both games. Both are great and both are good enough to stand on their own.

Why do gamers always have to put everything into an either or them vs us category. Two similar games that have a cross-over of player interest can exist at the same time. You don't have to try and create conflict out of that.

It's not that. The Gray Zone IS overpriced. It's an early access gun game with 2 variants of AR-15 and 2 variants of AK, riddled with errors.
Dub U May 2, 2024 @ 3:29pm 
Originally posted by L1qu1dator:
Originally posted by ChubbiChibbai:

And has a fraction of the content.
Additional content will take a long long time to come. Its a very small dev team going at a slow pace.

Look. I love both games. Both are great and both are good enough to stand on their own.

Why do gamers always have to put everything into an either or them vs us category. Two similar games that have a cross-over of player interest can exist at the same time. You don't have to try and create conflict out of that.

It's not that. The Gray Zone IS overpriced. It's an early access gun game with 2 variants of AR-15 and 2 variants of AK, riddled with errors.
GZW is not overpriced. The base game is a bit more than double the price of IRR and you get significantly more content. While I agree that this shouldn't be an "us vs them" thing, spreading false information just furthers that divide.

I got IRR before I got GZW and it just always left me feeling disappointed b/c of how little there was to do. Granted I've only put four hours into IRR but that's because it had no staying power for me. I wanted to like it and it may be good in the future, but initial impression for me at least, GZW is a better game, performance aside.

GZW has:
- Larger map with more POI
- More weapon customization
- More quest variety and quality (it's not just "go plant these bombs/trackers")
- PvEvP for those who want it
Spook May 2, 2024 @ 8:41pm 
Originally posted by Dub U:
Originally posted by L1qu1dator:

It's not that. The Gray Zone IS overpriced. It's an early access gun game with 2 variants of AR-15 and 2 variants of AK, riddled with errors.
GZW is not overpriced. The base game is a bit more than double the price of IRR and you get significantly more content. While I agree that this shouldn't be an "us vs them" thing, spreading false information just furthers that divide.

I got IRR before I got GZW and it just always left me feeling disappointed b/c of how little there was to do. Granted I've only put four hours into IRR but that's because it had no staying power for me. I wanted to like it and it may be good in the future, but initial impression for me at least, GZW is a better game, performance aside.

GZW has:
- Larger map with more POI
- More weapon customization
- More quest variety and quality (it's not just "go plant these bombs/trackers")
- PvEvP for those who want it

yeah but grey zone also got released in a un playable state for most people, either you turn on DLSS and have a game that looks ok and has no input lag but you will be playing at 40 to 50FPS, OR you turn on FSR and frame generation and you get 70 to 80 FPS or more but the game looks so bad you cant see enemys from more than 100m away and the frame generation make you have input lag so when you move the mouse left or right the aiming is delayed by about 0.5 to 1 sec which makes the game basically unplayable, either way you choose DLSS or FSR both ways have a downside that ruins the game.

at least red river released their game in a very playable state, yes it needs more maps, more loot items, more guns ect... but the game is playable and enjoyable more content will come in the future and im looking forward to seeing it progress.

i have grey zopne aswell and im not even playing that game anymore until they optimize the game to run properly because at the moment for me and about 90% of the playerbase its not an enjoyable experiance to play the game at all, more content means nothing when the game wont even run properly and the servers are jittering and lagging.

so for now red river is by far the better game to play.
ChubbiChibbai May 2, 2024 @ 10:30pm 
Sorry it doesn't run well for you on your PC.

The game looks incredible for me. Not sure what settings you are using or what hardware setup you have but i play with FSR scaling set to quality outputting at 4K. No frame gen. Epic settings and it looks gorgeous. I spot enemies from miles away. No issues. Locked at 60fps and its butter smooth. Only hitches are when flying into a new area for the first time.

I love both games but now GZ is out i don't see the value in spending much time playing this. I only bought this game last week but already bored of what content there is and compared to the sheer scale of GZ as well as the enemy AI and mission variety - there really isn't any competition.

What this game will offer as an advantage is much quicker runs in specific maps.
Jason rifleman May 2, 2024 @ 10:54pm 
I am enjoying this game than gray zone warfare. Incursion red river devs are too much better. They released several patches and the game is super fun. Gray zone warfare suffered errors, bugs and could not join the server. They did not patch the game.
Spook May 2, 2024 @ 11:38pm 
Originally posted by ChubbiChibbai:
Sorry it doesn't run well for you on your PC.

The game looks incredible for me. Not sure what settings you are using or what hardware setup you have but i play with FSR scaling set to quality outputting at 4K. No frame gen. Epic settings and it looks gorgeous. I spot enemies from miles away. No issues. Locked at 60fps and its butter smooth. Only hitches are when flying into a new area for the first time.

I love both games but now GZ is out i don't see the value in spending much time playing this. I only bought this game last week but already bored of what content there is and compared to the sheer scale of GZ as well as the enemy AI and mission variety - there really isn't any competition.

What this game will offer as an advantage is much quicker runs in specific maps.

the game doesnt just not run well for me on my PC, it runs badly for the majority of players, its the minority that are able to play the game and have the graphics looking good and no performance issues, you surely must see that greyzone is very badly optimized at the moment hence all the negative reviews it got, many people refunded the game because of how poorly it runs on PC's that should be able to run games like that easily, and its not just the performance that is bad its also the servers that are jittering and barely able to play, its just not a enjoyable experiance on greyzone at the moment, i will go back and try it again when they release updates that fix the performance issues, and fix the servers too
Originally posted by ChubbiChibbai:
Sorry it doesn't run well for you on your PC.

The game looks incredible for me. Not sure what settings you are using or what hardware setup you have but i play with FSR scaling set to quality outputting at 4K. No frame gen. Epic settings and it looks gorgeous. I spot enemies from miles away. No issues. Locked at 60fps and its butter smooth. Only hitches are when flying into a new area for the first time.

I love both games but now GZ is out i don't see the value in spending much time playing this. I only bought this game last week but already bored of what content there is and compared to the sheer scale of GZ as well as the enemy AI and mission variety - there really isn't any competition.

What this game will offer as an advantage is much quicker runs in specific maps.
GZW is bugged in its performance, its all over the place with no real answers.
e.g. I run it worse with a 3070 than a friend of mine with a 1070 and an older CPU, all while I'm on the lowest settings with all tweaks enabled, I was able to play it on epic with DLSS when I first launched it and it varies in its performance with each launch. It also isn't helped by its slow progress while you can just bug out, loose your secure container and knife while also being unable to matchmake with your friends if it happens - the only fix being wiping your character and praying that it doesn't happen again, which puts it in a really, really bad spot all the other bugs aside (like not being able to loot your own character because you either dont see it upon return or cant access it) and other major issues that had been pointed out during the creator playtest last week.
It furthermore also doesn't help GZW that they just took the praises from creators about the fun bits and turned it into a trailer, putting the creators in a bad spot as well while each one told them to not release it in the state it is in and rather focus on fixing the biggest issue within the next 6-12 months to make it ready for an EA release.

Edit: Also I disagree with there not being a point to play Incursion - for starters Incursion offers team damage in its coop environment, which makes it 10x more fun with friends already, not to mention the allowance for modding, which already is a huge plus point for any game.
Both games can easily co-exist and are fun on their own, I however see Incursion be the better game on the long run simply due to the modding support alone, another thing would be the fact that Incursion doesn't rely on the devs keeping the servers up, you can play it either way.
Last edited by [livE]Unknown_Genius; May 3, 2024 @ 5:07am
Pestilence May 3, 2024 @ 6:59am 
My main issue with this game is that the character saves, such as items and faction standing and money and all that is locally saved and can easily be edited to give yourself everything. People can just edit their save files and have everything. People dropping fully modded uber guns and such because they got them via save editting makes all progression seem worthless to me. Really killed it for me.
SlaughterX May 3, 2024 @ 7:06am 
does this games has floating beards on the face like gzw ?
SlaughterX May 3, 2024 @ 7:06am 
or not reacting windows when you shoot them ?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: May 1, 2024 @ 6:20pm
Posts: 24