Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
It work for me using ATI Radeon HD 585 1Gb.
but, of course, DTM EXPERIENCE look very HEAVY in comparison of Assetto Corsa or F1 2013 Codemaster...
and do not forget, it use old GMotor2 by ISI... in rFactor i will use all setting in full/high and AA SS 4X , 49 car ingame, dynamic night/day transation... and all in 100FPS FOREVER !!!
Set the shader quality to "mid". That should be gain some fps. I cant see any difference at the graphics.
http://nimga.com/v/AlT3r
Just tested, I get a minimum of 41 FPS with my settings.
https://virtualcircuits.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/dtm-experience-new-screenshots/
But while Moscow Raceway is still playable on my system with the settings that I use for the other tracks (a minimum of 55 FPS), Lausitzring is really a FPS eater (minimum 40 FPS).
DTM and R3E has the same behavior i have 50-60 fps on 1080p maximum setings on custom setings and HI res 1k shadows . When i disable the 1K shadows my fps are going 20-30% more.
Its not normal your DTM to run in such low fps something is going wrong with you system, maybe the drivers , maybe the setup . but for sure its not normal.
Just for the sake of correctness: The cubemap setting concerns the reflections on the cars surface, not shadows. I use the lowest setting as I think glossy racecars are simply not realistic, but if one prefers it you should avoid using the highest setting. It's really just for testing purposes, very demanding and doesn't give that much of a visual boost.
Thank you , Thats correct my mistake....
R3E has much acurate tracks. If you watch Real Life track Like Mount Panorama ,or Portimao , even the trees are in the right position.
Also the lighting and the sky is much better on R3E.
Also the tarmac on R3E has much much much better detail than Asseto Corsa.
You can see the crack from the heat on the road
Also tyre smoke is more acurate on R3E to.
AC has better cockpits, and laser scaned tracks . But you have to know that they laser scan the surface of the tarmac and not the objects on the track.
This is my opinion , and dont forget that i am from Greece, THe people behind AC are Greeks to
so you can understand that normaly i have to say all the good thinks about AC :)
AC has the best physics i have ever try but sorry in track desighn R3E is way better.