Can i also play complete in medieval times?

[Robbin]

Is it also possible to play full medieval instead of with future weapons and vehicles?

[an entire Roman legion]

there are other games for that. try mount&blade bannerlord

[Paul Fisch]

There are a variety of bows and crossbows that you can use

[Robbin]

Originally posted by Paul Fisch:

There are a variety of bows and crossbows that you can use

Great, and what about swords and horses :)?

[Gnome026]

Originally posted by Albob:

there are other games for that. try mount&blade bannerlord

they are not asking for other games. they are asking about this game.

[an entire Roman legion]

Originally posted by Gnome026:

Originally posted by Albob:

there are other games for that. try mount&blade bannerlord

they are not asking for other games. they are asking about this game.

thank you for your input

[Ģ◊иℤ◊⚡ℤ∀муpΛй]

Why would you want to ride the horse and have medieval armor you can literally play m&b for this, this game is perfection with the addition of modern content its a time paradox and i love it.

[an entire Roman legion]

would be like asking for a total war but without the battles

[Paul Fisch]

Players can't currently ride horses, but that is something we very well may add before 1.0

[Ensign]

Originally posted by Albob:

would be like asking for a total war but without the battles

Im a total war player. A fan of the more traditional (superior in my opinion) older titles like Medieval 2 and Rome 1.

Your quote isnt as far fetched as you think it is. Total war without the battles is a perfectly fine way to play. Your essentially just pressing "Auto Resolve" on every battle for the purpose of focusing on empire building and economic simulation on the campaign map. Back when Total War cared about campaign play and not just the battles (even though the battles were superior in the older titles).

The equivalent here is to play kingmakers as an RTS without engaging with the Third Person Shooting aspect. I dont see why we cant choose to focus on one over the other. Like total war, a game is better with both aspects but sometimes some people will prefer one style over the other.

I too would like to wade in as a fellow swordsman in a squad, shoulder to shoulder with my men hacking and slashing my way into the castle interior.

Yeah yeah, "play mount and blade for that" but why not here?? Its like asking "you want to ride a horse in an rpg? Play Barbie Horse Adventure for that, this is an RPG". Its all about variety in play style.

[an entire Roman legion]

i mean, nobody is stopping you from NOT using game mechanics.... but for most people core mechanics are.... core mechanics....

[Echorion]

Originally posted by Paul Fisch:

Players can't currently ride horses, but that is something we very well may add before 1.0

I hope so, your cover image for the game is literally them on a horse with an assault rifle.
Don't want to give people the wrong impression after all.

[XGNw3th3p3ople]

Originally posted by Paul Fisch:

Players can't currently ride horses, but that is something we very well may add before 1.0

lmao it better be!! Your main image is that also for balanced game-play it would make sense one of the earliest forms of transport you could get is a horse moving your way up to cars and trucks also swords shields ext better also find there way into this as what your just going to have us loaded to tits with guns right off the hop ?? no build up what about ammo ? you run out and need to grab a melee weapon seems to make sense to me.

[Pezdispenser]

While we're at it, will the enemies be able to acquire guns and vehicles? This game is giving me faint Violence Jack vibes and I would like to see horse mounted RPG-7 knights charging against tanks while machine guns pin down advancing spear formations.