Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Luckily there's enough good stuff to keep going.
Also, I don't blame anyone for bouncing off the Tarkovsky one. The glacial pacing doesn't suit modern watching sensibilities. I need to be in the right frame of mind to watch his stuff.
It's funny that I have now seen some claim that the game will annoy people who are "sympathetic to western analytic philosophy" and others claim it will annoy people who are sympathetic to christian theism.
Maybe the game annoys some people because not every single quote caters to their preferred ideological experience.
it's contextual to the themes of the puzzles (usually involving discovering a new perspective or understanding a new "law" for the solution)
It's contextual to the entire theme of the game. The whole game is about perspective. All of the puzzles are about perspective. All of the quotes are in some way about perspective. Just as you stare at the shadow of a tree branch and think about what the shadow could mean in seven different ways for the purpose of a puzzle, you might also hear a quote that encourages you to contemplate a glass of wine and the hundred different ways you could perceive the wine (as food, as chemical, as a cultural item, as a collection of atoms, etc) and the glass that contains it (as container, as distilled rock, as a cultural item, as a collection of atoms, etc) and what all of that means and how it relates to you, if you care at all.
Some people are apparently unable or unwilling to appreciate how the quotes are related to the rest of the experience. They're not just thrown in "for a highbrow veneer".
But I wanted to punch that "what is time really" guy in the mouth for the entire time he was talking. I think it was his manner of speaking, like he was trying to hypnotize you into buying his self-help books. Does anyone know who he is? Also the "stop looking" woman. I'd like to know more about their kind of bizarre philosophies.
so puzzel very hard much think LOL
you should put more effort into your strawman jokes
It will annoy both, depending on your exact type of christian theism. They at least admit as much about Russell and the Positivists, a tad dismissively, in the "story" logs
If your favouite Philosopher is Rodolf Carnap, like me, you're in for a LOT of hours of opposing dialogue.
If your Favourite Philosopher is the more hard-headed, worldly Christians like Erasmus or even Pelagius, you'll likewise be annoyed at the endless parade of Protestant or mystic christian thought.
The game is pretty much the opposite of Nietzsche. You'll find no will to power here.
This is partially because it refuses to use quotes emphasising conflict and questioning or any hostility (though you'll find some mildly harsh anti materialist quotes.), and to a large extent, even Verificationist science is a constant, unrelenting attack on all other systems, and on itself.
The game is in general not a fan of pure reductionism and materialism, and a strong supporter of Holism and Eastern perspective. Not due to any inherant bias on the part of the developers, but because it's hard to put philosophies that emphasise challenge, breaking apart, and constant methodical attack and hostility, in a game focused on calm immersion, synthesis, and sudden epiphany. The closest they get is a Zen quote, really.
I TIP MEH FEDORA TO U GOOD SIR. EPIC FEDORA FAIL xD