Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Different maps of a region you have but who you would attack from different directions
I am sorry, but I really don't understand, what you want to tell me here.
Not at all. Hills, little villages, forests absolutely would give so much variety. French is not just a flat country with always one hill with windmill on the left and windmill on the right with little forest .... And the wasteland is developing slowly time after time. 1914 there is no wasteland. This argument is, I am sorry, bs.
My words.
And of course height differences in terrain mattered.
Yeah well it seems, that for you it's enough strategical depth to build your trenches in just a few maps always in the same layout over and over again. Good for you.
Yeah exactly and it's absolutely boring to play the same map over and over.
+1 for more maps!
Also, the battlefields are constantly changing, haven't you noticed that yet? Mostly with the seasons