安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Also wasn't the becker a purpose-built AA gun? it's caliber wouldnt allow to fire at infantry without breaking the conventions of war.
The Mle 1913 is the truck mounted version, and as I said, was pre-war. However, was intended as anti-zeppelin and anti-balloon rather than anti-aircraft. Shooting at aircraft with a 75mm Gun in 1913 (given the standards of aircraft back then) was considered overkill.
It was later that they were used more against aircraft. Again an odd distinction for us now, but, at the time it was zeppelins that were considered the greater threat given how high they could fly (out of reach of most contemporary aircraft pre-war). The first purpose built heavy *anti-aircraft* guns were designed in 1916 and entered service in 1917. The earlier anti-zeppelin and anti-balloon guns of course were practically interchangable in use and existed earlier. Sorry should have made that clear.
The Becker was designed not as a ground-based AA weapon, but as an automatic cannon light enough to be mounted in aircraft. It was the progenitor of the MG FF used in the 1930s and the early part of the 2nd World War.
The AT situation in the game, though, is comical. Standard infantry are like ze goggles... they do nothing. Meanwhile, a single trench raider almost insta-kills any tank within range. There could be a little more parity, there: standard infantry could do slightly more damage, and trench raiders could do a bit less.