Is performance a lot better in crysis 2 and 3 remastered compared to crysis 1 remastered

[AceHercules1196]

Like crysis 1 remastered runs at 30 FPS to 160 FPS is it a lot better in 2 and 3 remastered

[dml!]

In short, yes, since they don't suffer from CPU limited performance anywhere near as much as C1R does. C2R is fairly heavy on the GPU however, so depending on your system it might not run blisteringly fast. But a mid range gaming PC or better from around the last five years shouldn't have much of a problem.

[AceHercules1196]

Originally posted by dml!:

In short, yes, since they don't suffer from CPU limited performance anywhere near as much as C1R does. C2R is fairly heavy on the GPU however, so depending on your system it might not run blisteringly fast. But a mid range gaming PC or better from around the last five years shouldn't have much of a problem.

Well that’s good to hear that Crysis 2 and 3 remastered might actually run well on my 4090 because as I said crysis 1 remastered performance sucks even with a 4090

[TRIPLE A ®™]

Not worth it. The originals are holding up just fine in 2022.

[MTL5]

Originally posted by Corey:

Like crysis 1 remastered runs at 30 FPS to 160 FPS is it a lot better in 2 and 3 remastered

When did you last play Crysis 1 Remastered?

[MTL5]

Originally posted by DOUBLE J ®™:

Not worth it. The originals are holding up just fine in 2022.

They really don't. For a start, they're broken on AMD hardware, and modern Windows. The have severe performance issues as a result. The remasters are an upgrade in every way. C2 is a massive visual upgrade, and C3 is a moderate but welcome one. They're more stable, they play better, they have PC QoL features like FOV sliders.

[DeadPhoenix]

Originally posted by DOUBLE J ®™:

Not worth it. The originals are holding up just fine in 2022.

Crysis 2 Remastered over the original is a massive upgrade. Its a night and day difference, has DLSS and Ray Tracing support.

[pauldiazberrio]

Originally posted by Corey:

Originally posted by dml!:

In short, yes, since they don't suffer from CPU limited performance anywhere near as much as C1R does. C2R is fairly heavy on the GPU however, so depending on your system it might not run blisteringly fast. But a mid range gaming PC or better from around the last five years shouldn't have much of a problem.

Well that’s good to hear that Crysis 2 and 3 remastered might actually run well on my 4090 because as I said crysis 1 remastered performance sucks even with a 4090

Are you serious? A 4090 would wipe the deck with this game. You could easily get 200 fps if you configure the game properly. I don't imagine that card would experience any difficulties running any of the trilogy.

[pauldiazberrio]

Originally posted by pauldiazberrio:

Originally posted by Corey:

Well that’s good to hear that Crysis 2 and 3 remastered might actually run well on my 4090 because as I said crysis 1 remastered performance sucks even with a 4090

Are you serious? A 4090 should wipe the deck with this game. You should easily get 200 fps if you configure the game properly. I don't imagine that card would experience any difficulties running any of the trilogy. What's the matter?

[AceHercules1196]

Originally posted by pauldiazberrio:

Originally posted by Corey:

Well that’s good to hear that Crysis 2 and 3 remastered might actually run well on my 4090 because as I said crysis 1 remastered performance sucks even with a 4090

Are you serious? A 4090 would wipe the deck with this game. You could easily get 200 fps if you configure the game properly. I don't imagine that card would experience any difficulties running any of the trilogy.

Well the first game still has huge frame drops even with a 4090

[dml!]

Yeah the 4090 should breeze through C2R and C3R. The problem with C1R is it's quite heavily CPU limited when there's a lot of objects (even on good CPUs because it doesn't use many cores and threads). The last patch (in February I think it was) helped a bit, but it still suffers, and the only real solution is to lower the settings for objects and vegetation. The original C1 is similar, getting a stable frame rate is extremely difficult.

[MadAsAHatter]

I bought the release version of Cr1 on epic and it ran like a turd on my (decent) system. Now, after 3 or 4 patches it's fine. There are some settings that completely hog performance, one being the object distance combined with high physics and shadows because it's very CPU bound. CR2 and CR3 run like a charm.

[AceHercules1196]

Originally posted by DOUBLE J ®™:

Not worth it. The originals are holding up just fine in 2022.

Apart from the fact that crysis 3 original has worse performance issues than crysis 1 remastered making crysis 3 original unplayable

Also crysis 2 remastered looks quite a lot better than the original and has Ray Tracing

And crysis 3 remastered actually has good performance and has Ray Tracing

So I would say that the remastered versions are better overall

[AceHercules1196]

Originally posted by MTL5:

Originally posted by Corey:

Like crysis 1 remastered runs at 30 FPS to 160 FPS is it a lot better in 2 and 3 remastered

When did you last play Crysis 1 Remastered?

That performance that I mentioned was from a few days ago before the trilogy release on steam and it was running on a 4090 at 3440x1440 max settings

[AceHercules1196]

Originally posted by dml!:

Yeah the 4090 should breeze through C2R and C3R. The problem with C1R is it's quite heavily CPU limited when there's a lot of objects (even on good CPUs because it doesn't use many cores and threads). The last patch (in February I think it was) helped a bit, but it still suffers, and the only real solution is to lower the settings for objects and vegetation. The original C1 is similar, getting a stable frame rate is extremely difficult.

I can confirm that the 4090 runs crysis 2 and 3 remastered perfectly fine at 3440x1440 max settings at upto 120FPS without DLSS

[MrEWhite]

Originally posted by Corey:

Originally posted by DOUBLE J ®™:

Not worth it. The originals are holding up just fine in 2022.

Apart from the fact that crysis 3 original has worse performance issues than crysis 1 remastered making crysis 3 original unplayable

Also crysis 2 remastered looks quite a lot better than the original and has Ray Tracing

And crysis 3 remastered actually has good performance and has Ray Tracing

So I would say that the remastered versions are better overall

OG Crysis 3 runs fine here maxed at 4k. Haven't gotten the remastered downloaded yet, though.