Game system requirements.

[Wolverine10]

Hi there , ijust wanted to know what specs and what configuration settings you are using to play this game cause i think my pc is not giving its best to play this...
Thanx

[Nessuna Luce]

[Specs]
MB :: ASUS P6X58D-E
PSU :: Corsair TX850W
CPU :: Intel I7 950 @ 4,0ghz
RAM :: Corsair XMS 3 - 18GB
GPU :: EVGA GTX 670 FTW
HDD :: WD Caviar Black WD5001AALS 500GB 7200rpm
Display :: BenQ XL2420T

[Settings]
Ubersampling: OFF (damn near slays my pc)
Texture downscaling: NONE (Which technically is highest)
Motion Blur: OFF (I hate that crap! - personal preference)
Dangling Objects Limit: OFF (Which technically is highest)
Vertical Sync: OFF ('Cause I don't see the point in this game)
Everything else set to their highest setting...

[Performance]

Action
55-80fps
(I'm in control and can run around and slay people)

Cinematic / Talk sequence
35-118
(a little all over the place - dunno why, doesn't feel laggy though and seeing as I don't need to be able to react very fast to anything it doesn't matter much, only including it because it is rendered in realtime within the game engine)

[frostie]

will i be able to run both games with my notebook i5 hd4000 8gb ram

[Nessuna Luce]

j4960s a écrit :

will i be able to run both games with my notebook i5 hd4000 8gb ram

I'm not personally acquainted with the HD4000 series but built in graphics card hardly ever delivers a fluid nor 'pretty' gaming experience, personally I need a dedicated graphics card (preferably Nvidia) to play...

The official (minimum) requirements are:

CPU
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
RAM
1 GB Windows XP / 2 GB Windows Vista and Windows 7
Video Card
512 MB RAM, supporting Pixel Shader 3.0 (NVIDIA GeForce 8800 or ATI Radeon HD 3850)

Your CPU should be suficiant (despite being a mobile processor), plenty RAM - buuuut I don't think your graphic card is going to run it very well, maybe at the absolute lowest settings...

I actually doubt that my laptop with a dedicated GT540 will run it much past medium...

[Doctor Go-Go]

Might be wrong but it says memory it doesn't say all of that memory has to be RAM. And if the minimum is 512.. What game has ever been worth the hardware needed for the best quality? The only thing that ever really comes out of it is less blured textures, maybe more view distance and better lighting if the lighting isn't shoddy and bugged as usual.

[frostie]

i have over 100 games and i play them on 1366x768 res a game like far cry 3 i use low settings and it still looks like a xbox 360 game batman arkam city on low settings still looks amazing also grid 2 looks amazing and thanks for the video

[Nessuna Luce]

MolestO the Clown a écrit :

Might be wrong but it says memory it doesn't say all of that memory has to be RAM. And if the minimum is 512.. What game has ever been worth the hardware needed for the best quality? The only thing that ever really comes out of it is less blured textures, maybe more view distance and better lighting if the lighting isn't shoddy and bugged as usual.

If you're talking about what I posted - the min specs then yes it says it requires 512mb VRAM - and 1GB (normal) RAM...
But I have yet to encounter a game that couldn't be played on systems way below what they posted as a minimum, I think their minimum should be followed by "- if you want it to look and play as we intended" a Nvidia catch phrase for devs I guess ;)

As for you comment on games being worth the price of admission - in this case the hardware, I would say it comes down to the eyes of the beholder, some people love games for their graphics and style others for the sheer gameplay...
And then there's those of us in the middle, I like when a game hits a great and beautiful graphics style even if I have to play around with settings to squeeze the last few fps from my graphics card or even at the cost of a few fps - however I have always felt that graphic quality comes second to actual gameplay and I will probably always feel that way 'cause who gives a crap if a game looks like real life if all characters in it does the stop motion dance lagging through at 1 fps!

As a final note I am happy to se some devs being able to balance the pursuit of having the best looking in-game graphics with great gameplay like Metro Last Light - it looks bloody awesome but is capable of running with very minor hiccups and bumps in the road on my GTX670 FTW...

[frostie]

i have metro last light and i play it on low settings and 1366x768 res the game runs smooth and looks good, i like great gameplay reliability & graphics

[Wolverine10]

Hi mates,i really appreciate your comments and i want to thank you all.
I started this topic because i only can play the game with almost no fps issues if i am on low settings with 1920x1080 resolution.In medium settings and high settings i get bad game playability...
My PC specs are :
CPU:Core i7-2630QM
CHIPSET:Intel HM65
GPU:Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M graphics 1.5GB GDDR5
Memory:8GB DDR3
HDD:750GB 7200RPM

[frostie]

i bought the game today and running it on low settings and 1366x768 and it runs great

[Wolverine10]

Yes i can give a try to those resolutions but with this specs shouldn´t i be able to play it cool in 1920x1080 and at leat medium settings?My specs are superior to the recommended...I like to play the games at 1920x1080 and i think i have machine for that..