Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Now, another matter are books whose actual texts contain information relevant to gameplaying. I'm thinking of that set of 4 books for gargoyle contract. Geralt doesn't learn anything from them (as it doesn't add any journal entry or whatnot), but the player does learn from it. The book excerpts displayed contain information for puzzle solving (or contextualization of the world of Witcher, such as in books like 'Monstrum, a portrayal of the witchers'). You can safely skip reading these books if you have played the game or resort to 'external help' (namely google and wikia lol).