Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
At least we know which "Critics" we can trust for the truth and which ones we cannot as they all jump on the bandwagon (probably without even playing the game) and are afraid of the wrath of Activision.
You know it's possible some people could like the game and actually give it a 7 or 8, maybe higher. It's runs really well on consoles and is alot of fun there, even though it's nothing special. There is more to the world than the PC hanging from the tip of some people's noses. These meta user scores sometimes get change to happen and games patched quickly but usually these complainers come off as entitled brats.
I've had no issue in 1 hour of MP so it could be the first day jitters or just a bad peer host?
Single player is upto 5GB VRAM on my GPU only 4GB of RAM so the game does use RAM or VRAM to try and store about 9GB in either in the first few levels. I seem to be using less RAM than most but way more VRAM.
So the game defaults for VRAM but will settle for RAM. looks wise its the best COD yet not Bf4 but pretty good so far. MP felt like COD. So its a solid COD game.
But its an insane system hog right now new GPU drivers and patches will be needed for many to get it playable unless you all run out and buy 6GB GPU's.
CPU wise it's not a hog about 25% on average on a quite Oc'd i7.
Now for the future it heralds very responsive gameplay. If your lucky and have 6GB VRAM and 8+GB RAM the game fully loads into RAM and is super responsive, none of the normal popup texture or object crap COD almost has had. That's gone in the new 64 bit engine.
I normally suck at sniping even in SP this game is very responsive as it sits fully in VRAM and RAM and I'm pulling off crazy shots.
A single Titan is running it at 100FPS at almost 2 the res of 1080p 16:9 so its not as demanding as some claim bar the huge VRAM use.
and you speak for all fans, and because you've bought this asking daddy moneys, go to get a job parasite
i was reading some of the 10/10....ran into this one
1999 Nov 5, 2013
10
Absolutely fantastic new innovative Fish AI. The fish actually move out of your way when you swim towards them. Mind blowing. Another brilliant addition to the greatest video game series of all time. Also, dogs.
Till they optomise this game it's the new Crysis by accident.
Barring that, so far the SP is fun (actually as good as BO2) and the MP felt like a COD game and the maps are pretty good so far (i've seen 4).
I hate to defend Actiblizzard for anything but this is a fun COD game what currently hurts it is the need for very high PC specs to enjoy it looking much better than on console.
It's better than Infestation Survivor Scams. PC gamer saying 6-7 was correct. I think it's better than MOH:WF was last year they do need to sort the tech issues on next gen consoles and PC though.
A 3/10 for a game that doesn't launch? What exactly are you rating? The reviews are YOURS, and YOUR experience. If you can't launch it, you have no experience you paid $60 for. Hence, 0/10, no excuses.
Believe it or not, the metacritic for Battlefield has the same issue, but for some their user score is still loads higher. Probably because it isn't this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of a game.
Or, before buying a game, try being sure that you have the ability to use it. Secondly, people need to seek help before simply giving up.