安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You talk like this is the only thing causing problems, agreed it is causing some issues, but the underlying lag is the poorly optimized game.
Black Ops 2 worked "out the box" at the moment of release. This is the biggest botched release since MW3
Another idiot that say "But x86!!!!" Stow it, this is a port. It doesn't work for a lot of the PC community, meanwhile console peasants are playing it without a hitch. It's a port. They screwed the community, go kiss ass elsewhere.
Oh and, brush up on your computer language skills...claiming "x86-64" is getting old.
I think it's you who needs to some research.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_%28microarchitecture%29
As for Ready Boost, its merely a basic flash caching option for lower end systems. Any modern machine with a decent amount of DDR3 and or an SSD will see no measurable gains. It is not designed to improve appliction performance, merely windows boot performance by caching smaller files normally requiring slower hd requests during boot. Once windows fully boots it does nothing for applications such as games etc.
As for the page file comment... Windows *needs* a pagefile to function without issue. Period. End. Of. Story. Memory management in Windows requires it to work correctly. You can get away with a smaller page file than Windows default 1.5:1 page to RAM ratio but its a big no no to disable it outright. Despite popular (and incorrect) belief, this does not force windows to only use physical RAM.
^Haha he did it again....
welcome to the club.
So 6GB needed for MP hmmm.... Every option maxed and 4xTX AA, also works a charm with a Titan and latest driver and Windows 7. No lag no stutter CPU usage is low as well and seem to be 4 threads working very hard and 4 turning on and off. But any decent quad core should cope it seems so far.
So if you have a Nvidia GPU do make sure your using the COD recommended driver.
So far my only issue is the lack of FOV control.
Ok playclaws OSD works fine and reports FPS and VRAM RAM CPU and GPU use.
Ok it uses all maxed at 2560x1080 (just under 4 megapixel)
99% GPU runtime with all the extra maxed. And max 56% of a 4.8 Ghz 2600k.
4.5-almost 6 GB RAM use in SP
But (and this has just made my jaw hit the floor) 4.4 GB VRAM use at only 4 megapixel (not even 4k).
Not even BF4 at 4k res 2160p used 4.4 GB VRAM.
So on older cards if you max the game AND they have not got the setting right or drivers right you may get epic lag as the RAM VRAM fight.
P.S. Titan is steady 90-100 FPS vysnc off at 2560x1080 21:9. Basically COD:G ghost is the most demanding PC game we have yet seen in SP.
So after all the HYPE with the release show, where in which they promised this.
" WE HAVE REALLY LISTENED TO THE COMMUNITY THIS TIME"
So they remove MOST HARDCORE modes, you now get 3 KC, TDM SnR
They release a poorly optimized piece of crap ALPHA level game.
TO TOP IT ALL OF THEY LIE ABOUT SERVERS.
A Tweet from the Activision team stated that ALL PLATFORMS were to get dedicated server. Guess what i just had my fist experience of, yes thats right MIGRATING HOST, something we have not had to deal with since MW3 was canned and BLACK OPS 2 came out, which has dedicated servers, and is an alround better game, Activision want PC gaming to die out, that is why they are supporting the PC correctly, this saddens me and as a veteran PC gamer of over 15 years this angers me.
Thanks CONSOLES for ruining the FPS genre forever, before you existed FPS games were good, not look at what you have made it become.