Much more fun than Battlefield 4

[MaxxGold]

I bought Battlefield 4 first and I was really impressed with everything you can do compared to COD but the problem is the games are just boring. There is no flow to the games and people just camp good spots and get kills. There are so many campers and snipers and it ruins games. Don't get me wrong it's a great game and the levolution and destructable enviroments are awesome, not to mention the vehicles but It's just not as fun as good old Call of Duty. COD has a fast pace and the games flow much better. The character movement is better too. In Battlefield 4 your charactyer feels awkward. You do get used to it but once I came back to COD the character feels smoother. I'm sure people will disagree but for me COD is just a better multiplayer game. It still needs true rentable dedicated servers with server browsers to bring the whole pc community to the game. Initially that's why I chose Battlefield 4 because I could rent my own server and play the game the way a pc shooter is supposed to be played. My friend talked me into buying COD again because I was truly done with the way they treat the PC community but I'm actually glad he did. We have been playing against bots to get a feel for the multiplayer maps. I like that you can now play every game mode against bots, pretty cool. I did have to turn off my second video card to get the game to play without graphic errors. Nvidia doesn't have the SLI drivers out yet. Having a good time so far.

[Axiom]

Messaggio originale di bigbenisdaman:

I can see how you didn't follow the story if you're dieing every 2 seconds....same thing happens when i try playing WaW on vet...they have boxes of grenades and keep throwing them where you don't have anywhere to run too!

Actually I did try to follow the story.

[Axiom]

Messaggio originale di Bhaya:

Messaggio originale di VertiGO:

Funny thing is, the character you play as in MW2's campaign dies significantly faster than in Ghosts's campaign. I don't get it!

I don't even remember the difference, anymore. But reading from your description, perhaps you should consider equipping the gun, at least at one point of the game. It is not a riddle! I repeat, CoD is not a game of riddles! ;-)

Simply I die so fast in that game, usually 3 bullets is enough. I die a whole lot less in the Ghosts campaign if I want to rambo it! But I wouldn't want to put it on easy either! And now that I think of it, why did I play or try to play the campaign instead of the multiplayer? Oh well. Speaking of dying fast, Full autos in Ghosts kill so fast as compared with BO2 or previous games.

[Bhaya]

Messaggio originale di VertiGO:

Speaking of dying fast, Full autos in Ghosts kill so fast as compared with BO2 or previous games.

Yes, for me, this a major fun killer in Ghosts. You have no time to react, and where is the fun in that? Shooting a fraction of a second earlier should give a player an advantage, and not give him a guaranteed win in a duel as it is in Ghosts. This is an arcade game and not a real gun simulator.

And I thought, that there was already a short time to kill in BO2 in comparison with BF3/BF4... But it was manageable and balanced. In Ghosts, you hear a short crackle and you are dead, in a tenth of a second. I don't know whether it is intended or just a bad netcode but I wish it was addressed by IW.

[Axiom]

Messaggio originale di Bhaya:

Messaggio originale di VertiGO:

Speaking of dying fast, Full autos in Ghosts kill so fast as compared with BO2 or previous games.

Yes, for me, this a major fun killer in Ghosts. You have no time to react, and where is the fun in that? Shooting a fraction of a second earlier should give a player an advantage, and not give him a guaranteed win in a duel as it is in Ghosts. This is an arcade game and not a real gun simulator.

And I thought, that there was already a short time to kill in BO2 in comparison with BF3/BF4... But it was manageable and balanced. In Ghosts, you hear a short crackle and you are dead, in a tenth of a second. I don't know whether it is intended or just a bad netcode but I wish it was addressed by IW.

It simply isn't fun to die extremely quickly, sometimes using a gamepad on PC is so irritating because I have almost no chance, and to make matters worse, no dedicated servers yet, equals occassional lag while trying to kill someone. I mean one time I think I went 19 - 8 in a match, and I'm almost certain none of them were using Gamepads. Oh well, I guess I should look into buying Ghosts for console. Ghosts on PC has mouse input lag, and for me it's obvious it's there. I simply don't understand how people use mouse and keyboard for this game. And this is coming from me, a PC player.

[Bhaya]

Messaggio originale di VertiGO:

Ghosts on PC has mouse input lag, and for me it's obvious it's there.

I have a problem with mouse acceleration in Ghosts and workarounds didn't fix it. Simply, mouse sensitivity is all over the place.

I am staying away from Ghosts for now anyway, since in BF4 there is a a whole week of Double XP, and then additional weekend for Premium customers. I want to unlock most, if not all the weapons, during this time.

[swenor]

Messaggio originale di jv209:

lol @ complaining about snipers in BF4. 90% of snipers in BF4 fail since you have to achieve a headshot to get a one hit kill past 15 meters or so.

It's awesome for headshots to be deadly and body shots NOT being deadly. That's how it should be. Snipers' advantage is range.

[Axiom]

Messaggio originale di Bhaya:

Messaggio originale di VertiGO:

Ghosts on PC has mouse input lag, and for me it's obvious it's there.

I have a problem with mouse acceleration in Ghosts and workarounds didn't fix it. Simply, mouse sensitivity is all over the place.

I am staying away from Ghosts for now anyway, since in BF4 there is a a whole week of Double XP, and then additional weekend for Premium customers. I want to unlock most, if not all the weapons, during this time.

Good idea.

[Bhaya]

Messaggio originale di swenor:

It's awesome for headshots to be deadly and body shots NOT being deadly. That's how it should be. Snipers' advantage is range.

I completely agree with that. Besides, campers tactic, especially for snipers in BF4 is not really valid. Definitely, not in TDM and Domination. You lose more than gain. And that also how it should be.

[Ham Stroker's Ejacula]

Messaggio originale di Bhaya:

Messaggio originale di swenor:

It's awesome for headshots to be deadly and body shots NOT being deadly. That's how it should be. Snipers' advantage is range.

I completely agree with that. Besides, campers tactic in BF4 is not really valid. Definitely, not in TDM and Domination.

>can't camp in a game
>says it's bad

BF4 is the better game for team and squad based play, which rewards you for doing so. CoD is better for the instant gratification that it delivers and the easy pick up and go style"

This debate will always be happening until CoD becomes such spoonfed dribble that people get tired of it and all move to battlefield.

[Axiom]

Messaggio originale di Guyver:

Messaggio originale di Bhaya:

I completely agree with that. Besides, campers tactic in BF4 is not really valid. Definitely, not in TDM and Domination.

>can't camp in a game
>says it's bad

BF4 is the better game for team and squad based play, which rewards you for doing so. CoD is better for the instant gratification that it delivers and the easy pick up and go style"

This debate will always be happening until CoD becomes such spoonfed dribble that people get tired of it and all move to battlefield.

Incorrect, Battlefield won't always be an option. Who knows, it might go just like Medal of Honor , useless and boring. Speaking of which, what happened to it?

[bigbenisdaman]

BF4 campaign = hand holding fail.