Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This allowed them to create a unique never been told Batman story that involves gameplay mechanics they want to implement while still staying loyal to the fans and the content.
No movie IP game will ever be able to accomplish this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z2M6IHluWc
the comics far exceed the movies in terms of creativeness so if anything the movies are shallow and lack creativeness.
If you are a Batman comic fan then you have obviously been mind controlled by Ivy, if not then you have no buissness messing with the most accurate Batman of all time.
the door is to your left.
A game based on that universe would just be a normal beat'em'up with the Batman name.
Nolan bridged a gap with his take on Batman, he turned it into something believable, something people could relate to and think to themselves "this could actually happen". It brings with it a new dynamic and put the fanbase closer in touch with the character and what was going on, that does not happen in these games.
The games are great fun and I enjoyed both of them, however there was always a disconnect due to the ridiculousness of it all. It would be nice to play a game where you are actually living the believable life of Bruce Wayne and Batman, something a billionaire playboy who is in great shape could theoretically do given the technology and his financial position in the world, something real...
Obviously people in this community are far too closed minded and puristly engrained to understand the want for something more intrinsically tied in with real life, the entire premise in which Batman is roughly based around. A normal guy who is insanely rich, in good shape and uses the technology at his disposal to turn into who he is...
If you want real life go outside, i never felt disconected from the batman comics but i felt disconected from the nolanverse. It's not wrong to be a purist as it's respect to batman's origional medium.
I and many others enjoy reading the outlandish stuff (hense the popularity of superman) a realistic batman doesn't work and so you should just except what we have as a good character within an unrealistic universe.
When did you become a fan of batman? was it the animated series? Knightfall? no mans land? New 52? or was it that piece of crap trilogy that is a betrayel to everything batman is.
There's a difference between real life and a realistic version of Batman. Why do you want to convince people that the movies are bad? Why not just accept that some people enjoy the movies and some prefer the comics...I'd wager some people even enjoy both!
Some would even consider modern Batman to be a betrayal of what Batman started as...When he used guns and was a straight up detective.
TL;DR: Can't we all just get along?
Personally, I'm a fan of games and comics BECAUSE they don't have to be realistic. They CAN be outlandish, and have so much more freedom to tell a great story. And they don't have a 2 hour time limit, which means you can have well rounded characters and a good story. Nolan's Batman universe was boring to me because for all its realism, the characters were all very flat and one dimensional.
Also, if Bale's Batman voice didn't make the whole Batman premise ridiculous, I don't think you can gripe about comic book silliness.
Has anyone here seen multi-development of a game before? Two studios are given the same task and supposed to create the same game, an amazing thing happens. You get the premise of what was given to both teams but in the end each is a different game as it was created by different people with their own spin to it.
Xbox, PC and Gamecube version (Go to 1:25)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9-QWnFLJvA
PlayStation 2 version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82vAX2QiNH0
This game was developed by two completely separate branches of EA, EA Seattle and EA Black Box, they literally created the game twice and released both. The version for PC, Gamecube and Xbox was a completely different game than the version for the PS2, same idea but completely different.
The PlayStation 2 version of the game was substantially better and the production value was over the top in comparison. When you bring options to a franchise, approach it from different angles it is actually possible to create something far better than the original or what else has come before, just because something came first or is how it is doesn't mean it's the best it could have been done or will be done in the future.
As Dan said, the entire "realism" thing just collapses when you stand back and look at the premise. Especially that voice.
Not to mention that, in my opinion, Bane was absolutely butchered as a character in TDKR.
I have so much respect for Rocksteady because they have respect for Batman. All these details throughout Asylum and City. The bios, the easter eggs. Everything. They put such a natural and fitting spin that grounds the universe in the middle. Not too realistic, but definitely not anywhere near cartoony.
It's just the perfect "vision" of Batman, in my opinion. Conroy voice. Intimidating (Bodybuilder lol) appearance. Fitting gadgets.
It connects with every Batman fan, movie or comics/animated series.
pd: TDK suit kicks ass and also the tumbler, if they put a rideable tumbler and batpod on it, I'm in.