Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I can confirm this.
It works just fine for me.
"optimizers" like the GF experience or AMD's Gaming Evolved are silly and pointless. It's just someone's opinion. What's "optimal" to one person may not necessary seem so to another.
In my experience AO runs and performs roughly the same. ymmv.
Correct and incorrect. It is not someone else's opinion. Optimizers that have cloud functionality scan your hardware and according to similiar specs that have been stored, it chooses the settings that provide the most stable fps. You will then have to re-tweak it because each computer is unique and behaves differently.
Maybe you think it's the game causing the problem, and not the settings that you have maximized because you think your computer is too 'godlike'. Cloud optimizers basically kick your ego down to the appropriate level if it's obvious that your computer can't handle the graphics. Usually, people notice a tremendous fps increase in such cases.
To hobbyists, optimizers are essentially useless because we manually do the tweaking ourselves. For casuals and people who only care about games, an optimizer is a nice complement.