Why are the girls you save somewhat sexualized?

[I'm a Cop, you Idiot]

I thought this was a game for kids....

[Edit] Im kinda tired of people flipping out thinking im angry and protective over what kids will see, im really not that was just a throwaway line I didnt put any thought into.

[Rae]

Serann님이 먼저 게시:

TripleMasterG님이 먼저 게시:

Do you feel gay, are you an SJW, Uh, do you feel like wolf kabob Roth vantage? Gefrannis booj pooch boo jujube; bear-ramage. Jigiji geeji geeja geeble Google. Begep flagaggle vaggle veditch-waggle bagga?

Man, I just noticed this topic is old enough to have seen the rise of the regressive left.
Of course, idiots like this one can be found in any age.

Regressive left assumes the left is regressing to a previous time, when in previous history has the left every been like this?

[24/7🔴Triple B>Backpacks/Keys]

Serann님이 먼저 게시:

TripleMasterG님이 먼저 게시:

Do you feel gay, are you an SJW, Uh, do you feel like wolf kabob Roth vantage? Gefrannis booj pooch boo jujube; bear-ramage. Jigiji geeji geeja geeble Google. Begep flagaggle vaggle veditch-waggle bagga?

Man, I just noticed this topic is old enough to have seen the rise of the regressive left.
Of course, idiots like this one can be found in any age.

What are you talking about. Leftist ideas support feminist groups and so called "social equality", what I said was mocking it. How can I be a regressive leftie? Could you stop trying to sound smart by making spiteful comments towards others?

[Serann]

TripleMasterG님이 먼저 게시:

Serann님이 먼저 게시:

Man, I just noticed this topic is old enough to have seen the rise of the regressive left.
Of course, idiots like this one can be found in any age.

What are you talking about. Leftist ideas support feminist groups and so called "social equality", what I said was mocking it. How can I be a regressive leftie? Could you stop trying to sound smart by making spiteful comments towards others?

That is a rather ironic statement to make, given your original comment, isn't it?

Anyway, I was not referring to you as part of the regressive left, I just noticed that this topic is now two years old and has therefore seen its rise.
You being an idiot is not connected to the social state of the world, at all.

[Tayzor Azul]

I'm a Cop, You Idiot님이 먼저 게시:

I thought this was a game for kids....

[Edit] Im kinda tired of people flipping out thinking im angry and protective over what kids will see, im really not that was just a throwaway line I didnt put any thought into.

The same reason why many games that are fantasy, women wear bikini armor.
Also +1 on what Serann said this was a kids game back in 1998, I think the audiente matured... something you shoud do too. And stop making threads showing your sexism.

[MaiAhsHole]

No matter the reason, the fairies design is unnecessary. Someone on the design team REALLY likes fairies.

[Rae]

The PAC님이 먼저 게시:

No matter the reason, the fairies design is unnecessary. Someone on the design team REALLY likes fairies.

Clearly. You have to go out of your way to design them like that.

[Caesar]

The PAC님이 먼저 게시:

No matter the reason, the fairies design is unnecessary. Someone on the design team REALLY likes fairies.

Agreed.

[Tayzor Azul]

Its rated E for everyone for a reason you know. This game was never meant for kids, and even if it was you think they have the mind to comprehend what sex appeal means ? I think not.
Also its a video game exageration is a must in order to keep those kids realise that what they see is not real.

[Rae]

Tayzor Azul님이 먼저 게시:

Its rated E for everyone for a reason you know. This game was never meant for kids

Then don't you think it's only appropriate to rate it so that it couldn't be mistaken for a kids game? It's rated E10+ If a gave is rated for EVERYONE (10 and up) then it doesn't matter WHO it's "meant" for.

It's like rating a southpark game or a family guy game E, it looks like a cartoon, something kids like and it has the appropriate rating. It's dumb to think kids wouldn't play this or parents think it's not okay especially since they remember Rayman being a tiny bit more wholesome growing up.

http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.aspx?titleOrPublisher=Rayman&searchType=title

Kids also DO have the mind to comprehend sex appeal, people make kids out to be so much dumber than they actually are, by the age of 5 they can comprehend A LOT. This is how so many stereotypes and "standards" are set especially for any young girls playing. They grow up with media portraying essentially the same message over and over. Don't be ignorant.

[Tayzor Azul]

Shadow님이 먼저 게시:

Tayzor Azul님이 먼저 게시:

Its rated E for everyone for a reason you know. This game was never meant for kids

Then don't you think it's only appropriate to rate it so that it couldn't be mistaken for a kids game? It's rated E10+ If a gave is rated for EVERYONE (10 and up) then it doesn't matter WHO it's "meant" for.

It's like rating a southpark game or a family guy game E, it looks like a cartoon, something kids like and it has the appropriate rating. It's dumb to think kids wouldn't play this or parents think it's not okay especially since they remember Rayman being a tiny bit more wholesome growing up.

http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.aspx?titleOrPublisher=Rayman&searchType=title

Kids also DO have the mind to comprehend sex appeal, people make kids out to be so much dumber than they actually are, by the age of 5 they can comprehend A LOT. This is how so many stereotypes and "standards" are set especially for any young girls playing. They grow up with media portraying essentially the same message over and over. Don't be ignorant.

Yeah im sure at the age of 5 kids already know the scope of the universe, they even know how Hitler died, heck they even know what came first the chicken or the egg.
Keep in mind that we the kids of the 90's grew up by playing on console or PC.
These new generation kids play only on tablets on expensive phones that mommy and daddy buy for them and they do not even have a childhood.
Kidds are nothing but little shi-t heads, im sorry but thats the sad truth about our evolution.
With each decade human kind gets more and more idiotic to the point until we get extict.

[MaiAhsHole]

Somebody's kid-triggered.

[Rae]

Tayzor Azul님이 먼저 게시:

Yeah im sure at the age of 5 kids already know the scope of the universe, they even know how Hitler died, heck they even know what came first the chicken or the egg.

Why are you being so disingenuous and strawmany? I NEVER said that and it's dumb to just run full speed with my argument like that.

Tayzor Azul님이 먼저 게시:

Keep in mind that we the kids of the 90's grew up by playing on console or PC.
These new generation kids play only on tablets on expensive phones that mommy and daddy buy for them and they do not even have a childhood.

Just because a childhood is not like yours or previous generations, doesn't mean they didn't have one. How freaking retarded do you have to be to pride yourself on us 90s kids growing up on console and PC games but shame the new generation for using tablets and phones? The generation before us thought the EXACT same thing about playing outside instead of computer games, saying kids are just being zombies and not playing outside with sticks and riding bikes.

Tayzor Azul님이 먼저 게시:

Kidds are nothing but little shi-t heads, im sorry but thats the sad truth about our evolution.
With each decade human kind gets more and more idiotic to the point until we get extict.

While I'm cynical so I believe that to a point, I also don't want kids but I know enough that it's not the kids fault, it's the parents who raise them at least 50% the other 50% is personality. With people like you who argue in such an obtuse manner, I'd say your prediction is correct so far.

[heartburnron]

Gave a little woop when if first seen and rescued the first Nymph myself I have to admit...

[Ragdollintothewall]

The designer of this game is french, and they don't have puritan attitudes about sexuality. Sexuality and attraction to it are an essential part of human existence and pretending otherwise is dumb.

[Rae]

RhinoceritisDDS님이 먼저 게시:

The designer of this game is french, and they don't have puritan attitudes about sexuality. Sexuality and attraction to it are an essential part of human existence and pretending otherwise is dumb.

That's like saying porn (sex) is an essential part of humance existence (it is) but kids don't need to see it on tv right? Or do you believe that's puritan too?