Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
lol i get it now you are just trolling.
Are you really trying to defend the game's optimization ? It runs like absolute garbage compared to most "pretty graphics" games out there. And it's not gonna help the number of active players at all.
There's a reason why some games stay popular. Fortnite ? Runs on a potato. Counter Strike ? Runs on a potato. League of Legends ? Runs on a french-fry. Minecraft ? 10K$ PC needed.
What's the common point between these games ? They're massively popular and run on potatoes.
Grab a Ryzen 5600, or i5 12400f. Those are budget CPUs and willl run anything like butter, including this game. You need to upgrade eventually, and you don't need anything high end like you claim.
There's tons of people out there like myself with a gaming laptop, which are not upgradeable machines. While writing this, I'm currently running "Lies of P", beautiful graphics from last year, everything in ultra. "Remnant 2", same, looks awesome, runs awesome, 2023. Meanwhile to play The Finals with a smooth 60fps I need to run it on the worst possible settings and 1024 resolution.
I can barely see the enemy lol