Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But to answer yes countless.
I almost found that if your the first team to start a cash out it’s best to just to spread out in a perimeter to keep fighting away from the cash out. Obviously this wouldn’t always work but prioritizing staying alive versus keeping the cash out 100% of the timer is a way to ensure you can get the last steal.
Right. A tactic that isn't about defending the objective but more so about putting your team in a position to steal the cashout at the end. Because why not? You only need to capture that last 5% of the cashout and all 100% of it is yours.
I think if the increments were smaller but more frequent, it wouldn't be as messy I think.
My other idea would be instead of 2 cashouts to win, make it like 6 or more but decrease the time it takes for it to end significantly. That way whoever cashes out first only has to win maybe 2 fights on the objective
I don't have to be a bad player to think the current gameplay loop is flawed or frustrating. I think i do fairly well at the game