Apex legends players are killing this game

[Just Chimplebee]

The players that came from the Apex community have dynamically changed the game. The amount of tryhards went from a few to every game. Anyone else feeling that?

[Scriptimus]

"Tryhards" LOL! People still actually use this unironically?

[Ronald]

its called sbmm in casual

[Flamespeare]

I thought SBMM was ONLY in ranked? Is it in casual games too? That would explain a lot since after some good rounds i seem to get the most sweaty tryhards ever. These ♥♥♥♥♥ shold play in their own league.

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

I thought SBMM was ONLY in ranked? Is it in casual games too? That would explain a lot since after some good rounds i seem to get the most sweaty tryhards ever. These ♥♥♥♥♥ shold play in their own league.

They are, that's what the matchmaking loosely does in casual... Don't play PVP games if you can't handle losing whilst not "trying".

[Flamespeare]

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

I thought SBMM was ONLY in ranked? Is it in casual games too? That would explain a lot since after some good rounds i seem to get the most sweaty tryhards ever. These ♥♥♥♥♥ shold play in their own league.

They are, that's what the matchmaking loosely does in casual... Don't play PVP games if you can't handle losing whilst not "trying". :Horse:

Well, lots of players hate SBMM for a reason. Ranked MM would be good enough, at least in a mode of its own. Im trying tho...

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

They are, that's what the matchmaking loosely does in casual... Don't play PVP games if you can't handle losing whilst not "trying".

Well, lots of players hate SBMM for reason. Ranked MM would be good enough, at least in a mode of its own. Im trying tho...

No, lots of inflated ego's hate SBMM.

[Flamespeare]

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

Well, lots of players hate SBMM for reason. Ranked MM would be good enough, at least in a mode of its own. Im trying tho...

No, lots of inflated ego's hate SBMM. :Horse:

I mean, sure. It sucks if you get stomped a couple of times in a row.

All I head was that people loved this game without SBMM and once it was implemented, the flame because of that went overboard.

Would be fair to have both some SBMM and some Ranked or free/casual modes imo.

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

No, lots of inflated ego's hate SBMM.

I mean, sure. It sucks if you get stomped a couple times in a row. All I head was that people loved this game without SBMM and once it was implemented, the flame because of that went overboard. Would be fair to have both some SBMM and some Ranked or free/casual modes imo.

And you don't think you could be stomped multiple times in a row without SBMM? A full dice roll? You could get scrim teams 10 times in a row. You'd be on the receiving end of what you want, the ability to play against people way worse than your own skill level.

[Flamespeare]

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

I mean, sure. It sucks if you get stomped a couple times in a row. All I head was that people loved this game without SBMM and once it was implemented, the flame because of that went overboard. Would be fair to have both some SBMM and some Ranked or free/casual modes imo.

And you don't think you could be stomped multiple times in a row without SBMM? A full dice roll? You could get scrim teams 10 times in a row. You'd be on the receiving end of what you want, the ability to play against people way worse than your own skill level. :Horse:

But wouldnt i progress more naturally towards upranking the ranks then? Instead of playing as a silver noob against platinum/diamond players just because i had some luck & good three rounds before?

If im steamrolling the players, i would slowly rank up to a place where i belong. I feel like SBMM does that WAY to quick and way to hard.

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by Robert De Nitro:

Originally posted by Scriptimus:

And you don't think you could be stomped multiple times in a row without SBMM? A full dice roll? You could get scrim teams 10 times in a row. You'd be on the receiving end of what you want, the ability to play against people way worse than your own skill level.

But wouldnt i progress more naturally towards upranking the ranks then? Instead of playing as a silver noob against platinum/diamond players just because i had some luck & good three rounds before?

No, you wouldn't progress anywhere, it would be random lobbies every time.
If a "silver" is matching with "plat/diam" isn't this what you want? The SBMM is clearly quite loose if this is the case, no?

[Wehzy]

Funny how kids these days complain about people "trying to win" in a video game.

[Wehzy]

Originally posted by Frieza:

Originally posted by Atticus:

Not really, I'm coming from Apex and I don't think I'm the only one that's pretty bad considering the objective based gameplay as way different than the battle royale format. Also, being good and being a tryhard aren't the same thing.

Yes. Being good and trying hard are not the same thing. Glad you figured that out. Doesn't solve the try hard problem.

its literally the same thing.
Google up the definiton.

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by Wehzy:

Funny how kids these days complain about people "trying to win" in a video game.

It's a huge cope, rather than admitting someone just played better than them in a game, instead they just "tried harder". Makes them feel better about themselves.

[[787] DasKänguruh]

💀

[Silver]

It's called SBMM. have fun and good luck.