Ridiculous amount of losses

[TheChicagoMike]

How the ♥♥♥♥ are you gonna release a game where you can't even get a 20% win ratio?

[Netsa]

I don't know why everyone's pretending a 20% win ratio is normal even for solo queue. This game doesn't rely that much on having a good team or having voice comms, just use pings, don't abandon your team, and play Tournament. How is that hard?

[identity]

Originally posted by Netsa:

I don't know why everyone's pretending a 20% win ratio is normal even for solo queue. This game doesn't rely that much on having a good team or having voice comms, just use pings, don't abandon your team, and play Tournament. How is that hard?

You're way too brainwashed over forced 50% matchmaking, which is a lot harder to do when there are 2 or 3 other teams to play against.

[Netsa]

Originally posted by id:

Originally posted by Netsa:

I don't know why everyone's pretending a 20% win ratio is normal even for solo queue. This game doesn't rely that much on having a good team or having voice comms, just use pings, don't abandon your team, and play Tournament. How is that hard?

You're way too brainwashed over forced 50% matchmaking, which is a lot harder to do when there are 2 or 3 other teams to play against.

There's 4 teams in Tournament but 2 teams win, so that's still 50%. Even in Quick Cash, there's only 3 teams, so that's 33%. In Bank It, there's 4 teams, or 25%.

So how do we get down to 20% other than sucking really hard?

[aSoulBelow]

nobdoy cares though

[identity]

Originally posted by Netsa:

Originally posted by id:

You're way too brainwashed over forced 50% matchmaking, which is a lot harder to do when there are 2 or 3 other teams to play against.

There's 4 teams in Tournament but 2 teams win, so that's still 50%. Even in Quick Cash, there's only 3 teams, so that's 33%. In Bank It, there's 4 teams, or 25%.

So how do we get down to 20% other than sucking really hard?

May as well cut that ratio in half, because more often than not the teams that win quick cash and bank it are group queues, and the people who lose a lot, like OP only ever solo queue outside of ranked. If it were separate games for solo queue and group queue, then it might average out. Only one team wins in nonranked.

[Netsa]

Originally posted by id:

Originally posted by Netsa:

There's 4 teams in Tournament but 2 teams win, so that's still 50%. Even in Quick Cash, there's only 3 teams, so that's 33%. In Bank It, there's 4 teams, or 25%.

So how do we get down to 20% other than sucking really hard?

May as well cut that ratio in half, because more often than not the teams that win quick cash and bank it are group queues, and the people who lose a lot, like OP only ever solo queue outside of ranked. If it were separate games for solo queue and group queue, then it might average out. Only one team wins in nonranked.

Why would they separate casual and group queues in a non-ranked mode? And are you saying there's more groups in casual than in ranked?

[SolutionS]

Lol they should remove SBMM altogether, this isnt fortnite.

[Pupperaccino]

20% winrate? Why are you crying about the game devs releasing a game that you suck at. Just git gud bro

[Scriptimus]

Originally posted by SolutionS:

Lol they should remove SBMM altogether, this isnt fortnite.

Yes, this isn't fortnite, I should be able to stomp newbies, and players far worse than myself.

[Red0x_.]

its not the devs fault if ur just to bad

[Penguin]

it should be around 33%

[SellingHonda]

sucks to suck, my win rate is 50%

[HeAdLeSs]

If you want to a higher win ratio you have to play tournaments only. Quickplay modes tank your win ratio because only one team can win.

[borari]

Originally posted by OMEGA:

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3128304809
there you go, you just have the classic "skill issue"

just to be totally clear, the numbers this screenshot impute a 0.52/52% win rate. you've won 52% of games played. you cant have a win rate higher than 1.0/100% like you initially mentioned, that would require you to win more games than youve played.

Originally posted by DatBoiTim:

Originally posted by SuperDS64:

A novel concept: as you add more teams to a game where there is 1 winner, there will be more "losers" in varying placements.

Yeah, OP is delusional or doesn't understand basic math.

to be fair, "qualifying" is the condition for a win in this game, so getting second place is still a win, up until the last tournament round, so technically the global average win rate should be somewhere around 42.5%. if we're only considering the tournament mode that is.

[Marcy]

Seeing as it's always a minimum of THREE teams, rather than two, which is typical for competitive shooters your chances of being the winner goes down. Even more so in Bank It, where it's like 3v3v3v3.

The thing about The Finals is, not getting the "WINNERS" victory screen does not mean you lost. There's no win or lose. Just first, second, third, etc. positions.