So many games with 2 teams teaming together to focus on the third

[Cole]

Pretty sad tactic to win honestly.

[Sharker Limetail]

That's literally not possible.
There is no in game chat, and nobody would find someone on steam just to tell them.

[Dhomochevsky]

Originally posted by Cartermanmcd:

That's literally not possible.
There is no in game chat, and nobody would find someone on steam just to tell them.

for communication they can use an external software, as for getting both teams in the same match, well...

[Muu]

Theoretically its possible for them to coordinate, but whats more likely is people who are just kill hungry.

[Evilshan]

Originally posted by Cole:

Pretty sad tactic to win honestly.

Never seen a game with two teams teaming. How can you affirm "so many games"

Originally posted by Cartermanmcd:

That's literally not possible.
There is no in game chat, and nobody would find someone on steam just to tell them.

and as Cartermandnmcd say, is almost impossible to comunicate

[Ugandan Commando]

How is the two losing teams teaming up against the winning team a "sad tactic"? It's common sense.
Unless you mean a team shooting the other losing team instead of the winning team, in which case I concur because morons will give team A the free win just to get an extra elim on the score board

[formsim]

i've had plenty of unbalanced games where 1 team has just horrible players on it and the other 2 are at least competent. Result is 2 teams stomping the third second they show up to a fight.

probably seems like 2v1 but more likely third team is just really weak compared. Not to mention what Crab said, if 1 team is holding a cash out, you should expect other 2 teams to come full force

[SleeprunnerInc]

Originally posted by Cupcake:

Theoretically its possible for them to coordinate, but whats more likely is people who are just kill hungry.

There's one reason to teamup at times during a match.

For instance if I see that Orange team has managed to cap the cashout and the match is about to end and purple team starts capping, I will defend the purple team dude so they can cap it since if I killed them I wouldnt have time to cap the point.

I'd rather take that chance of getting the next cap than the match ending then and there.

It's a legitimate strategy to utilize.
Another is choosing to fight a team to the brink of them wiping and then backstabbing the other team so you can kill two in one.

[Loonessia]

Originally posted by Evilshan:

Originally posted by Cole:

Pretty sad tactic to win honestly.

Never seen a game with two teams teaming. How can you affirm "so many games"

Originally posted by Cartermanmcd:

That's literally not possible.
There is no in game chat, and nobody would find someone on steam just to tell them.

and as Cartermandnmcd say, is almost impossible to comunicate

Happens literally every other game for me, they'll be sitting around the cashout not shooting at each other while one team has it in but when my team comes, I'm getting hit markers from players in both teams

[Kimosamie<sAp.]

Originally posted by Crab:

Unless you mean a team shooting the other losing team instead of the winning team, in which case I concur because morons will give team A the free win just to get an extra elim on the score board

This happens a lot it's kind of weird. I don't think there's any communication between them just people who don't understand basic strats.

[Ugandan Commando]

Originally posted by Kimosamie<sAp.:

Originally posted by Crab:

Unless you mean a team shooting the other losing team instead of the winning team, in which case I concur because morons will give team A the free win just to get an extra elim on the score board

This happens a lot it's kind of weird. I don't think there's any communication between them just people who don't understand basic strats.

Yeah just people wanting to pull the trigger and shoot guns. I don't blame them too much since this is what the game is about, but maybe I'll have to check out competitive mode soon since it's getting a bit frustrating in Quick Cash

[Netsa]

The only situation in which I can ever see this happening is in Tourney, where if they're extra-smart, whichever two teams got cashouts first can team up on the two losing teams to guarantee the win.

If it's Quick Cash, it sounds like it's just stupid people.

Originally posted by Crab:

How is the two losing teams teaming up against the winning team a "sad tactic"? It's common sense.

It's funny because I expected this to happen when I first started playing, but instead all I've seen in Quick Cash is losing teams third-partying other losing teams. The winning team just sits back and sips soda through a straw while they get a free win.