Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Because he didn't have River in his life (She was moved), he trained to work at NASA, because he had the goal in his mind to go to the Moon, because they didn't meet eachother, Johnny had a desire to go to the Moon.
I hope that made sense and was what you were asking, if it wasn't, I'm sorry I couldn't be of help.
Thanks for clarifying.
After a night's sleep, I think I'm starting to come around to it. I just found it odd that after Watts and Rosalene put in the laborious effort of traveling back and forth through various periods of John's life all the while taking wild guesses of THE moment that triggered his desire to go to the moon with no luck until they got to his stargazing moment with River only to not want to use that piece as pertinent material in fabricating John's trip to the moon. I think I was wrongly equating strong desire to go to the moon = John going to the moon.
Thanks. I don't think I'm quite sold on how Rosaline's resolution for the situation was the most natural, intuitive, or simplest but I'm coming around to it.
That is correct. Sorry for the confusion.
It's fine, maybe I didn't read it properly. Anyway, I was only trying to help you understand the situation, or whatever caused you confusion, at least Ciaphas Cain could explain it to you, if I failed to.
From Watts' point of view, since River and John eventually did end up together even though he never returned to their promised place, Watts did not deem it necessary to carry out the job, considering that they only promised each other to go to the moon in the event that they'd lose sight of each other. Rosalene, however, took the content of the job literally, favouring the goal of going to the moon no matter the cost over what had really transpired (John and River's reality of living together without the need to carry out the promise).
In order to fulfill that wish, two things were necessary after the stargazing event: 1) John's brother had to survive, because if he didn't, John's memories would fade away again. 2) River had to disappear after their first meeting, because it is only without River in the picture that John would want to go to the moon (i.e. only when they're separated does their promise take shape); that was the crucial part of his motivation that Rosalene and Watts needed and couldn't find in their many blind tries prior to learning of John and River's first meeting. All the jumping was necessary to find that piece of his memory.
The stargazing is not a red herring, but did in fact occur in both scenarios, whether or not John remembers and whether or not River was present in his life later on.
Watts is upset for the same reason that the player may feel upset by the end of the game: Is removing River from most of John's life for the sake of carrying out the client's wish and their promise truly the more desirable path compared to the reality that John and River lived after having found each other at school, especially after you've witnessed everything they've gone through together? In the last stages of John's life, their happiness may have been clouded by the fact that they couldn't bridge the gap that John's missing memories created (with neither of them having been aware of the reason behind it); John was unable to comprehend River's distance and obsession with both the paper rabbits as well as the lighthouse, whereas River was unable to get John to remember their first meeting that was so very important to her no matter how hard she tried. But in the end, it's still the reality they managed to build together, and the River that you, the player, know, is the River from all the real memories, the River who grew up with John - and doesn't the fact that they were able to find each other again in spite of the missing memories have some merit?
Removing River from John's early life comes close to deleting her and is, as explained above, sufficient reason for Watts to react the way he did. Additionally, there was no guarantee that River, in the simulated version of John's life, would actually return even if John achieves his dream of going to the moon, because reintroducing River is not within Rosalene and Watts' capacity. That's why Rosalene asked him to trust her intuition while being unsure of her decision throughout the ordeal, and why the two of them were stunned and touched when "River" did reappear.
(Ugh I'm sorry this got so long; I initially misunderstood what you labeled as a red herring, so I edited my reply with what will hopefully clear up the confusion.)
Nice. That was a very thorough rundown of the plot. I appreciate it, and I enjoyed reading all of it. Although, I did not mean to say the stargazing event was the red herring. I was saying Rosalene's seemingly cold and calculating course of action that looked as if she was going to remove River from a significant portion of John's life solely to transplant the passion of going to the moon in John was the red herring. In actuality, Rosalene had more noble intentions of hoping to reunite John and River (albeit, it's all a fabrication) as well as accomplishing their job of getting John to the moon. Watts' surprise at the end wasn't that Rosalene's plan of reintroducing River had worked; he was surprised that River showed up. Period. He did not know Rosalene wanted to reunite John and River at the end. It's a sticky situation to be in for the writer. On one hand, you don't want to reveal Rosalene's full intention because you want John and River's reunion to be more impactful for the player, but on the other hand, making Rosalene looked as if she intended to do one thing and not the other requires a strong reason. From Rosalene's cagey behavior towards Watts at the end, I felt the typical person would catch a hint of suspicion of there being something more to Rosalene's action and that the withholding of information was transparent. That is why I thought the red herring did not succeed or felt natural.
I want to add one thing. The River's death became the trigger for the old moon wish, John thought subconsciously about it like a opportunity to "regroup" with his first and only love. It wasn't unrealizable dream of his life, as doctors thougth