Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is Capcom.
More like a month.
Just hope it isn't an Elden Ring fiasco where they never really did fix frame rate issues. But why should they? They got GOTY so why should they?
It just makes sense for chip makers to do this. If ever people can see a graph of hardware sales, you would always see a spike in sales at new Triple A game releases, specially the "unoptimized" ones that people would be interested in.
I think this is another profit opportunity for this devs/publishers too accept this contract and usually the contract runs for a week/month or even forever.
This is just a theory, but it just makes super sense. Specially with a game that looks like this, you would wonder why games like Horizon, Red Dead 2, etc. would run better in current hardware. (But games like Red Dead 2, when it released was also only optimized well for the top of the line hardware in that era.)
They just need to wait, in the next weeks many people´ll have finished the game already and ´ll move on, so there won´t be many to complain about performance anymore.
imagine being this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid
Top of the line can have an average of 60FPS that people wants. Thats the sweet spot.
Either the theory is right or they are just that incompetent, or maybe they dont care for performance at all as fanboys will defend them anyway no matter what.