Dragon's Dogma 2 is better than Baldur's Gate 3 and Witcher 3

[AzysLla]

I am not kidding. The NPC dialog is much more natural. BG3 has better written dialog but more acted out, as well as the game as a whole. I don't want to use the word "immersive" but to me DD2 is a more "lived in" world and although much more simplistic, the NPCs just feel more "normal". Also don't have to deal with all the conflicts and interactions among the party members which could become quite tedious. Capcom action vs turn base is a personal preference thing, but I am all for the former. Quests are short and sweet, none of the brainless quests like in Assassin's Creed yet they are concise and fun. The Dandelion quest alone in Witcher 3 really broke it for me - it took players up to like 1/3 of the main questline to keep searching for the dude who isn't even likable.

[FireShark]

And about 1000x less degen than BG3.

[Angel]

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[Rei Herodes]

better than mineirinho ultra adventures

[Osicat]

Originally posted by AzysLla:

I am not kidding. The NPC dialog is much more natural. BG3 has better written dialog but more acted out, as well as the game as a whole. I don't want to use the word "immersive" but to me DD2 is a more "lived in" world and although much more simplistic, the NPCs just feel more "normal". Also don't have to deal with all the conflicts and interactions among the party members which could become quite tedious. Capcom action vs turn base is a personal preference thing, but I am all for the former. Quests are short and sweet, none of the brainless quests like in Assassin's Creed yet they are concise and fun. The Dandelion quest alone in Witcher 3 really broke it for me - it took players up to like 1/3 of the main questline to keep searching for the dude who isn't even likable.

cant take you seious. but good trolling

This is prob the worst rpg I plaed in last 30 years. Ok action thu and cutscenes are good.

The fact is a console port thu kills it total.

In some years do you think ppl will have 1000,s of hours in this game like skyrim or BG3? (im at 1k + hours atm in bg3). no ppl forget this disaster of a crap game in a few month

[Tafyno]

Originally posted by AzysLla:

I am not kidding. The NPC dialog is much more natural. BG3 has better written dialog but more acted out, as well as the game as a whole. I don't want to use the word "immersive" but to me DD2 is a more "lived in" world and although much more simplistic, the NPCs just feel more "normal". Also don't have to deal with all the conflicts and interactions among the party members which could become quite tedious. Capcom action vs turn base is a personal preference thing, but I am all for the former. Quests are short and sweet, none of the brainless quests like in Assassin's Creed yet they are concise and fun. The Dandelion quest alone in Witcher 3 really broke it for me - it took players up to like 1/3 of the main questline to keep searching for the dude who isn't even likable.

Ultra troll

[BlazeRomulus]

er...I play both BG3 and Witcher 3 to death and to me they are too different games to even compare.

I am having a lot of fun with DD2 now though, over 25 hours in 3 days, time flies.

[Wenzel]

Yes, DD2 is very good!

[Seekrt]

I think they went for interactivity and tried to avoid the game feeling totally scripted.
In that sense, DD2 may have some advantage.

[Tobacjoe]

I agree this is up there with BG3. At the moment this seems like a game more suited for me than BG3 for sure but I still do like BG3. Never could get into Witcher because I hate that voice...

[Character Name]

I like DD2, but it's a very different game from BG3, and honestly, for me BG3 is better.